Home › NDC Lookup › Ingredients › Bimatoprost › 00023-9652-01
Durysta bimatoprost 10 ug Implant, 1 implant — NDC 00023-9652-01 package photo
Label image from the product's FDA listing (DailyMed) — may show a different pack size or an older label revision.

Durysta bimatoprost 10 ug Implant, 1 implant — NDC 0023-9652-01 (Billing 00023-9652-01)

by Allergan, Inc. · 1 IMPLANT in 1 POUCH

This is a package of 1 implant of Durysta bimatoprost 10 ug Implant from Allergan, Inc., marketed since Mar 2020 and currently FDA-listed. It is the main listing for this product, which comes in 2 package sizes.

NDC 00023-9652-01
🏷️ FDA NDC (as labeled) 0023-9652-01 billing pads the labeler segment with a zero
This package
Contains1 implant Medicaid pays$1,707.42 / unit · 12 mo Per package$1,707.42 / 1 implant · Medicaid Pack sizes2 compare ↓
Main listing for product 0023-9652 · Also comes in: 1 implant 0023-9652-03
Rx only Brand On market Non-controlled ⇄ Compare with another NDC
🗂️ FDA directory synced Oct 1, 2026 · this listing last changed Jul 24, 2026 · sources: openFDA · FDA label (DailyMed) · FDA Orange & Purple Book · First Databank · CMS NADAC, ASP, Medicare & Medicaid · RxNorm
📋 All sources & update times →

This page is curated, coded, and maintained by

Compiled from public FDA, CMS, DailyMed, NADAC, and related drug data sources. Editorial policy

NDC database record

One package, one record: these facts belong to NDC 0023-9652-01 alone.

Record
FDA NDC Directory package listing · Human prescription drug
Code segments
0023 labeler · 9652 product · 01 package
Package marketed since
Mar 4, 2020
Sample package
No — commercial package
Listing certified through
Dec 31, 2026
Billing quantity
1 EA per package
Barcode (UPC-A, from the NDC)
3 0023965201 9
Medicaid fills, this package
501 prescriptions in the last four reported quarters
FDA record last changed
Jul 24, 2026

Identity & classification

Regulatory identifiers FDA, NLM and CMS codes for this package

FDA NDC (as labeled) 0023-9652-01
Product NDC 0023-9652
11-digit billing NDC 00023965201
NCPDP billing unit EA — each (per item)
RxCUI 2286602, 2286607
UNII QXS94885MZ
Application # NDA211911
SPL Set ID 3f59da84-0bcc-4c84-b3e2-e215681ef341
Established class (EPC) Prostaglandin Analog
Chemical class Prostaglandins
DEA schedule Non-controlled
Marketing category NDA
Marketing status On market
FDA listing status Listed (active directory)
Marketing start 2020-03-04
Route INTRACAMERAL
Dosage form IMPLANT
Substance BIMATOPROST

Drug-database identifiers Medi-Span GPI and First Databank GCN / HICL / AHFS classification

GPI-14 86330015002320
GPI class Durysta
GCN Seq No 080813
GCN 47792
HICL code 022000
Ingredient (HICL) Bimatoprost
HIC1 code Q
Therapeutic class — broad (HIC1) Ear/Eye/Nose/Rectum/Topical/Vagina/Other
HIC2 code Q6
Therapeutic class — intermediate (HIC2) Ophthalmic Preparations
HIC3 code Q6G
Therapeutic class — specific (HIC3) Miotics And Other Intraocular Pressure Reducers
AHFS code 52:40.28.00
AHFS class Prostaglandin Analogs
FDB label name DURYSTA 10 MCG IMPLANT
FDB brand name Durysta
Legend status F — Federal legend — prescription drug or device
Quick answers
  • GSN (GCN sequence number): 080813
  • GCN: 47792
  • GPI-14 (Medi-Span): 86330015002320
  • HICL (First Databank): 022000
  • AHFS class code: 52:40.28.00
  • RxCUI (RxNorm): 2286602
Why two NDCs? The FDA registers this code as 0023-9652-01 — a 4-4-2 layout, and that's what's printed on the package and shown on DailyMed. For insurance claims, every NDC is standardized to a uniform 11-digit 5-4-2 format by adding a zero to the labeler segment → 00023-9652-01. Same drug, same package — only the format differs.
Where does this data come from?
Identifiers from the FDA openFDA NDC Directory and Structured Product Labeling; RxCUI from RxNorm (NLM); GPI from Medi-Span; GCN / HIC / AHFS / legend from First Databank.

RxNorm drug class

This medicine belongs to the Prostaglandin Analog class.

Pharmacologic class Prostaglandin Analog
Drug family (ATC) Prostaglandin analogues
Where does this data come from?
Therapeutic classes from RxNorm RxClass (U.S. National Library of Medicine) — Established Pharmacologic Class (FDA), ATC drug family (WHO) and mechanism of action, matched by this product’s RxCUI.

Clinical

Label name DURYSTA 10 MCG IMPLANT Ingredient Bimatoprost
📗 Our plain-language guide HelloPharmacist
  • It depends on the product you have. Lumigan, Zolymbus and Durysta lower high eye pressure in open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Latisse and generic bimatoprost 0.03% are f...
  • Lumigan and Zolymbus are one drop in the eye once daily in the evening. Latisse and generic bimatoprost 0.03% go on the upper eyelid margin once nightly with a fresh sterile applic...
  • Red, itchy or dry eyes are common, and you may notice lash growth or darker skin around the eye. Most of these are mild. Call me or your doctor if you have eye pain, vision changes...
  • Yes. It can make the iris more brown, and this is likely to be permanent. It may take months or years to notice. Your doctor can talk with you about this.
📖 Read our full Bimatoprost guide →

Supplement & herbal interactions

Some supplements/herbs that may interact with Bimatoprost — tap one for details:

Dimethylsulfoxide (dmso)Moderate Turpentine OilModerate AlchemillaMinor
🌿 Every supplement checked against Bimatoprost (3 interactions) — ranked by severity →
Where does this data come from?
Plain-language summary from MedlinePlus (U.S. National Library of Medicine); supplement & herbal interactions and nutrient depletion data from the Natural Medicines database; our full guide is HelloPharmacist editorial content.

Pricing

A drug doesn't have one price. Each row is a different public payment system, and none is what you'd pay at the counter — that depends on your insurance. The ⓘ on each row explains what it measures.

Price systemPer eachPer package
Retail pharmacies payNADAC · weekly Not in the retail survey — common for institutional, discontinued, or low-volume packs.
Medicaid paysCMS SDUD · 12 mo $1,707.42 $1,707.42 / 1 implant
Medicare drug plans payPart D · quarterly No Part D plan price is available for this NDC in our data.
Medicare Part B allowsASP · J7351 $213.756 / J7351 unit —
Where does this data come from?
NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost) is the CMS weekly pharmacy-acquisition-cost survey — what pharmacies pay. ASP (Average Sales Price) is the CMS Medicare Part B drug-payment file, published quarterly. Medicaid pays is computed by us from CMS State Drug Utilization Data (total reimbursed ÷ units, trailing 12 months) — gross of rebates and inclusive of dispensing fees, so it reflects what Medicaid paid, not an acquisition cost. Medicare drug plans pay is the median negotiated point-of-sale unit cost across plans listing this NDC in the CMS quarterly Prescription Drug Plan pricing files, before rebates. The VA pays is the federal contract price (FSS, and the statutory Big 4 ceiling where listed) from the VA National Acquisition Center pharmaceutical price file. All are free public government data; each measures a different payer, so the figures are not directly comparable.

Billing & reimbursement

FDA NDC (as labeled)0023-9652-01
11-digit billing NDC00023-9652-01
Format4-4-2 as registered → padded to 5-4-2 for billing (zero added to the labeler segment)
HCPCS J-codeJ7351
DescriptorInjection, bimatoprost, intracameral implant, 1 microgram
Billing units / pkg10 units
How the units are derivedThis package is 1; the HCPCS unit is 1 MCG, so one package = 10 billing units.
Medicare Part B spend (2026 (Q1))$3,411,507 · 1,581 claims · $2,157.82 per claim (all NDCs under J7351)
Crosswalk sourceCMS ASP NDC-HCPCS Crosswalk
Where does this data come from?
The HCPCS J-code crosswalk comes from the CMS ASP NDC-HCPCS crosswalk and the DMEPDAC (DME MAC) NDC-HCPCS crosswalk — free public CMS data. Billing units are derived from the code’s descriptor and the package amount.

Packaging — all sizes for this product

Package NDCDescription Marketing startMarketing endStatus
00023-9652-01 You're viewing this Main listing 1 IMPLANT in 1 POUCH 2020-03-04 — Active
00023-9652-03 0023-9652-03 1 IMPLANT in 1 POUCH Sample 2020-03-04 — Active

In Medicaid, this is the most-dispensed pack of this product — about 100% of fills over the last four reported quarters. See all packs ↓

Pack size FAQ

What quantity is in this package?
This package contains 1 implant — 1 implant in 1 pouch.
How does this package differ from NDC 00023-9652-03?
Both are Durysta bimatoprost 10 ug Implant — the drug itself is identical. This page's package is the 1 implant one, while NDC 00023-9652-03 is the 1 implant package.
What NDC number is used to bill for this package of Durysta bimatoprost 10 ug Implant?
Use the 11-digit billing form listed in the identifiers section of this page. Pharmacy and medical claims use the 11-digit form; the FDA label may print a shorter form of the same code.

Therapeutic equivalents

ProductLabelerPackNADAC/unitTEStatusPrice vs. this
Durysta 10 ugthis 00023-9652-01 Allergan, 1 implant — — FDA listed —
About this product: this is the brand-name version. We did not find an FDA-approved generic match for this exact strength, form and route.
Where does this data come from?
Equivalents are other NDCs of the same ingredient, form and route from the openFDA NDC Directory, ranked least-expensive-first by NADAC. Therapeutic-equivalence (AB) ratings come from the FDA Orange Book; biologics use the FDA Purple Book for biosimilar & interchangeable status.

Availability & generic status

🏛️
2020
First FDA approval
Mar 2020
📍
2026
Currently FDA-listed
6 years listed
🛡️
2034
Latest patent/protection listed
not a guaranteed launch date
🔒No FDA-approved generic found

We did not find an FDA-approved generic match for this exact strength, form and route. Patent/protection dates below may affect future generic timing.

🛡️ Latest patent/protection date listed: FDA patent/protection data lists protections through Oct 2034. This may affect when a full generic version becomes widely available, but it is not a guaranteed launch date.
📅 FDA approved Mar 4, 2020 RLD RS ⏳ ~8.1 yr to latest listed protection

Why the date isn’t exact: Generic timing can change because patents may be challenged, settled, licensed, added, removed, or worked around with a narrower label — and FDA approval does not always mean a pharmacy can get the generic today.

Patents & exclusivity — FDA Orange Book
US 8206737 — method of use (U-2759)
US 9980974 — method of use (U-2759)
US 9492316 — drug product
US 7799336 — drug product
US 8629185 — drug substance
US 10441543 — drug product
US 9149428 — drug product
2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034
Today
LOE
Substance patent Formulation patent Method-of-use patent Exclusivity Pediatric +6mo
🏛️FDA exclusivity
FDA-granted marketing protection. It’s separate from patents and may be shorter than patent protection.
🧪Product / substance patents
Patents covering the active ingredient, product, formulation, or related drug features.
🎯Method-of-use patents
Patents covering specific approved uses. These can sometimes be carved out with a “skinny label,” but not always.
🛈 What do these terms mean?
Patent
Legal protection listed in the Orange Book that may delay generic approval or launch. Issued by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.
Substance patent
Covers the active drug molecule itself — the hardest to design around. A generic generally can’t launch until it expires.
Formulation (product) patent
Covers a specific formulation or dosage form. A generic can sometimes work around it with a different formulation.
Method-of-use patent
A patent covering one specific approved use of the drug — not necessarily the whole molecule. A generic can sometimes launch with a “skinny label” that carves out the protected use and keeps the others.
Skinny label
A generic label that omits a still-patented use when the FDA allows it — letting a generic reach the market for the unprotected uses.
Exclusivity
FDA-granted marketing protection, separate from patents — e.g. 5-yr new chemical entity, 7-yr orphan drug, or a +6-month pediatric extension.
Paragraph IV
A generic applicant’s formal challenge to a listed patent. It can potentially lead to earlier generic entry, but often involves litigation or a settlement.
RLD / RS
Reference Listed Drug — the brand product the FDA uses as the reference for generic applications. Reference Standard — the product the FDA expects generics to compare against in bioequivalence testing.
TE / AB rating
FDA therapeutic-equivalence rating. An AB rating generally means the FDA considers a generic therapeutically equivalent to — and substitutable for — the brand.
LOE (loss of exclusivity)
The latest patent or exclusivity currently listed — the loss-of-exclusivity / latest-listed-protection date shown on this page. Paragraph-IV challenges and settlements can move the real date earlier; FDA approval and a manufacturer’s decision to market can move it later.

Built from the FDA Orange Book. The bars above are scaled to each protection’s expiry; the red LOE marker is the last one to lapse.

Listed patents (7)
PatentTypeUse codeExpires
US 8206737 ↗ Method of use U-2759 Apr 7, 2027
US 9980974 ↗ Method of use U-2759 Oct 31, 2034
US 9492316 ↗ Drug product — Oct 31, 2034
US 7799336 ↗ Drug product — Apr 24, 2029
US 8629185 ↗ Drug substance — Jul 15, 2031
US 10441543 ↗ Drug product — Dec 19, 2026
US 9149428 ↗ Drug product — Dec 19, 2026
Common questions
Is there a generic version of DURYSTA 10 MCG IMPLANT?
No FDA-approved generic equivalent is currently listed in the FDA Orange Book for DURYSTA 10 MCG IMPLANT. Based on the patents and exclusivity currently listed, the Orange Book estimate is that full-label generic entry may be delayed until Oct 2034 — an estimate, not a guaranteed launch date.
The FDA approved a generic — why can’t I get it at my pharmacy yet?
FDA approval and pharmacy availability are two different things. The FDA can approve a generic years before it actually reaches pharmacies, because the brand company may still hold patents or have a settlement that delays the launch. A manufacturer also has to choose to make and sell it, and have supply ready. So a drug can be “FDA-approved generic exists” and still be brand-only at the counter today.
Why do different websites show different generic release dates?
Generic availability is not based on one single date. Some sources use the first exclusivity expiration, some use the last product patent, and others use the latest method-of-use patent. Patent challenges, settlements, licenses, and label carve-outs can also change the real-world launch date. This page shows the underlying Orange Book dates so you can see why estimates may differ.
What does “FDA listed” mean?
It means the product appears in the FDA’s official NDC directory. That’s a good sign a product exists and is intended for the U.S. market, but on its own it does not confirm a pharmacy can fill it today. Where we have recent retail pricing data (NADAC) for a product, we label it “Availability likely” instead.
What does a patent or protection date mean here?
It’s the latest date currently listed in the FDA Orange Book for a patent or exclusivity on the brand product. It can affect when a full generic version becomes widely available — but it is not a guaranteed generic launch date. Generics sometimes arrive earlier (through a settlement or patent challenge) or later (a manufacturer still has to make and sell one).
What does “current Orange Book estimate” mean?
It means we are using the latest patent and exclusivity dates currently listed in the FDA Orange Book. It is not a guaranteed launch date.
Can a generic come out before the last patent expires?
Sometimes. A generic company may challenge a patent, settle with the brand manufacturer, receive a license, or obtain approval with a narrower label that avoids a patented use. In other cases, the last listed protection may delay full-label generic competition.
Can a generic come out after the listed dates?
Yes. Even after patents or exclusivity expire, a generic still needs FDA approval and a manufacturer must choose to market it. Supply, litigation, business decisions, or regulatory issues can delay actual availability.
What is the difference between patents and exclusivity?
Patents are legal protections usually issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. FDA exclusivity is marketing protection granted by the FDA. They are separate, and either one can affect generic timing.
Why are there multiple patent dates?
One drug can have several patents covering different things: the active ingredient, a formulation, a manufacturing process, or a specific approved use. That is why a page may show several expiration dates instead of one simple generic date.
Built from FDA Orange Book patent and exclusivity data. Dates are refreshed from public FDA data when available; the marker is max(latest patent expiry, latest exclusivity expiry). Paragraph-IV settlements and first-filer 180-day exclusivity can shift the real date; a method-of-use patent may allow an earlier skinny-label generic for non-protected indications. Generic launch timing is an estimate, not a guarantee.
Where does this data come from?
Patents and exclusivity from the FDA Orange Book (small-molecule drugs), refreshed from public FDA data. Generic launch timing is an estimate, not a guarantee.

Inactive Ingredients / Excipients

Inactive ingredients, also called excipients, are components of the drug product other than the active ingredient. They may include fillers, dyes, coatings, preservatives, flavors, or other formulation ingredients.

💡 Tap an ingredient (hover on desktop) to see what it is and why it’s used.

  • UNII WE369X5600
    A synthetic plastic polymer made from two natural compounds, lactic acid and glycolic acid, blended equally and designed to break down in the body over time. Used as a coating or matrix to control how slowly a medicine is released into the bloodstream.
  • UNII 3WJQ0SDW1A
    Polyethylene glycol is a synthetic liquid or solid polymer used in medicines as a solvent, lubricant, and humectant. It helps dissolve active ingredients, reduces friction during manufacturing, and retains moisture in the final product.
  • UNII 459TN2L5F5
    Polylactide is a biodegradable plastic polymer made from lactic acid, derived from corn or sugarcane. In medicines, it acts as a binder and film-former to hold tablets together or create coatings on capsules.

3 inactive ingredients listed in the exact product block matched to this NDC.

Where does this data come from?
Data sourced from official FDA Structured Product Labeling (SPL) via DailyMed — ingredient classCode="IACT" elements from the exact product block matched by this NDC. Label-section narrative from DailyMed / the openFDA label index is shown separately when available.

Inactive ingredient FAQ

Are inactive ingredients the same for every manufacturer?
No. Inactive ingredients can differ by manufacturer, dosage form, strength, and package / product version.
Why might an inactive ingredient be missing?
Some SPLs do not provide a complete structured inactive-ingredient list, and older or unusual labels may only include the information in narrative text.
Can inactive ingredients matter?
Yes. They can matter for allergies, intolerances, dyes, gluten / lactose concerns, preservatives, and formulation differences — but confirm with a pharmacist or the manufacturer when it’s clinically important.

Manufacturer & labeler

LabelerAllergan, Inc.
Application holderABBVIE INC
FDA applicationNDA211911 (NDA)
Labeler code00023
First marketedMar 2020
Product typeHuman Prescription Drug
Portfolio188 products on file

More NDCs from Allergan, Inc. labeler code 00023

The labeler markets the product; the application holder owns the FDA approval. They’re often the same company but can differ (e.g. a repackager or an authorized generic). A mailing address / phone appears here when the manufacturer includes it in the product’s FDA label (not all do).
Where does this data come from?
Labeler, application holder and registered establishment from the FDA openFDA NDC Directory and Drugs@FDA; address/contact from the product’s FDA label.

Full prescribing information FDA SPL

The complete FDA label for this product — the official prescribing information, verbatim, section by section. Jump with a chip, search within the label, or expand everything.
🎯 Indications and Usage ⏱️ Dosage and Administration 💊 Dosage Forms and Strengths ⛔ Contraindications ⚠️ Warnings and Cautions 🤒 Adverse Reactions 👥 Use in Specific Populations 🤰 Pregnancy 🧒 Pediatric Use 🧓 Geriatric Use 🧬 Clinical Pharmacology 🧬 Mechanism of Action 📦 How Supplied / Storage and Handling 📋 Description 💬 Information for Patients 🧬 Pharmacokinetics 🔬 Clinical Studies 🧪 Nonclinical Toxicology 📄 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility 📄 Package Label / Principal Display Panel
🎯 Indications and Usage 56 words ▾

1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE DURYSTA ® (bimatoprost intracameral implant) is indicated for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). DURYSTA is a prostaglandin analog indicated for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with open angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT). ( 1 )

⏱️ Dosage and Administration ~2 min read ▾

2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION For ophthalmic intracameral administration. ( 2.1 ) The intracameral administration should be carried out under standard aseptic conditions. ( 2.2 ) Figure 1 Figure 2 2. 1 General Information DURYSTA is an ophthalmic drug delivery system for a single intracameral administration of a biodegradable implant. DURYSTA should not be readministered to an eye that received a prior DURYSTA.

2.2Administration The intracameral injection procedure must be performed under magnification that allows clear visualization of the anterior chamber structures and should be carried out using standard aseptic conditions for intracameral procedures, with the patient’s head in a stabilized position. The eye should not be dilated prior to the procedure. Remove the foil pouch from the carton and examine for damage.

Then, open the foil pouch over a sterile field and gently drop the applicator on a sterile tray. Once the foil pouch is opened, use the applicator promptly. Figure 1 Perform a detailed visual inspection of the applicator, including ensuring that the actuator button has not been depressed, and the safety tab is in place.

Carefully remove the plastic safety cap taking care to avoid contacting the needle tip. Inspect the needle tip for damage under magnification prior to use; the implant retention plug may be visible in the bevel and should not be removed. Prior to use, remove the safety tab by pulling it out perpendicular to the long axis of the applicator (refer to Figure 1a above).

Do not twist or bend the tab. Stabilize the eye as the needle is advanced through the cornea. Enter the anterior chamber with the needle bevel visible through clear cornea.

Enter parallel to the iris plane, adjacent to the limbus through clear cornea in the superotemporal quadrant. The needle should be inserted approximately 2 bevel lengths with the bevel completely within the anterior chamber; avoid positioning the needle bevel directly over the pupil. Ensure the needle is not bent before depressing the actuator button.

See Figure 2. Figure 2 Depress the back half of the actuator button (refer to Figure 1b above) firmly until an audible and/or palpable click is noted. Following the release of the implant, remove the needle via the same track in which it was inserted and tamponade the opening.

The implant should not be left in the corneal injection track. Check the injection site for leaks; make sure that it is self-sealing and the anterior chamber is formed. After injection, do not recap the needle.

Dispose of the used applicator in a sharps disposal container and in accordance with local requirements. Instruct the patient to remain upright for at least 1 hour after the procedure so the implant can settle. Some degree of eye redness and discomfort is expected following administration.

However, it is recommended to instruct patients that if the eye becomes progressively red, sensitive to light, painful, or develops a change in vision, they should immediately contact the physician.

💊 Dosage Forms and Strengths 31 words ▾

3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS Intracameral implant containing 10 mcg of bimatoprost in a drug delivery system. Intracameral implant containing bimatoprost 10 mcg, in a drug delivery system. ( 3 )

⛔ Contraindications 189 words ▾

4 CONTRAINDICATIONS Ocular or periocular infections ( 4.1 ) Corneal endothelial cell dystrophy ( 4.2 ) Prior corneal transplantation ( 4.3 ) Absent or ruptured posterior lens capsule ( 4.4 ) Hypersensitivity ( 4.5 )

4.1Ocular or Periocular Infections DURYSTA is contraindicated in patients with active or suspected ocular or periocular infections.

4.2Corneal Endothelial Cell Dystrophy DURYSTA is contraindicated in patients with corneal endothelial cell dystrophy (e.g., Fuchs’ Dystrophy) [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ) ] .

4.3Prior Corneal Transplantation DURYSTA is contraindicated in patients with prior corneal transplantation, or endothelial cell transplants [e.g., Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK)].

4.4Absent or Ruptured Posterior Lens Capsule DURYSTA is contraindicated in patients whose posterior lens capsule is absent or ruptured, due to the risk of implant migration into the posterior segment. Laser posterior capsulotomy in pseudophakic patients is not a contraindication for DURYSTA use if the intraocular lens fully covers the opening in the posterior capsule.

4.5Hypersensitivity DURYSTA is contraindicated in patients with hypersensitivity to bimatoprost or to any other components of the product [ see Adverse Reactions ( 6.1 ) ] .

⚠️ Warnings and Cautions ~2 min read ▾

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS Endothelial cell loss : Due to possible corneal endothelial cell loss, administration of DURYSTA should be limited to a single implant per eye without retreatment. ( 5.1 ) Corneal Adverse Reactions : DURYSTA has been associated with corneal adverse reactions and risks are increased with multiple implants. Use caution in patients with limited corneal endothelial cell reserve.

( 5.1 ) Iridocorneal Angle : DURYSTA should be used with caution in patients with narrow angles or anatomical angle obstruction. ( 5.2 )

5.1Corneal Adverse Reactions The presence of DURYSTA implants has been associated with corneal adverse reactions and increased risk of corneal endothelial cell loss. Administration of DURYSTA should be limited to a single implant per eye without retreatment. Caution should be used when prescribing DURYSTA in patients with limited corneal endothelial cell reserve.

5.2Iridocorneal Angle Following administration with DURYSTA, the intracameral implant is intended to settle within the inferior angle. DURYSTA should be used with caution in patients with narrow iridocorneal angles (Shaffer grade ˂ 3) or anatomical obstruction (e.g., scarring) that may prohibit settling in the inferior angle.

5.3Macular Edema Macular edema, including cystoid macular edema, has been reported during treatment with ophthalmic bimatoprost, including DURYSTA intracameral implant. DURYSTA should be used with caution in aphakic patients, in pseudophakic patients with a torn posterior lens capsule, or in patients with known risk factors for macular edema.

5.4Intraocular Inflammation Prostaglandin analogs, including DURYSTA, have been reported to cause intraocular inflammation. DURYSTA should be used with caution in patients with active intraocular inflammation (e.g., uveitis) because the inflammation may be exacerbated.

5.5Pigmentation Ophthalmic bimatoprost, including DURYSTA intracameral implant, has been reported to cause changes to pigmented tissues, such as increased pigmentation of the iris. Pigmentation of the iris is likely to be permanent. Patients who receive treatment should be informed of the possibility of increased pigmentation.

The pigmentation change is due to increased melanin content in the melanocytes rather than to an increase in the number of melanocytes. While treatment with DURYSTA can be continued in patients who develop noticeably increased iris pigmentation, these patients should be examined regularly.

5.6Endophthalmitis Intraocular surgical procedures and injections, including DURYSTA, have been associated with endophthalmitis. Proper aseptic technique must always be used with administering DURYSTA, and patients should be monitored following the administration.

🤒 Adverse Reactions ~2 min read ▾

6 ADVERSE REACTIONS The following clinically significant adverse reactions are described elsewhere in labeling: Implant migration [see Contraindications ( 4.4 )] Hypersensitivity [ see Contraindications ( 4.5 ) ] Corneal adverse reactions [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 ) ] Macular edema [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 ) ] Intraocular inflammation [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.4 ) ] Pigmentation [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.5 ) ] Endophthalmitis [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.6 ) ] In controlled studies, the most common ocular adverse reaction reported by 27% of patients was conjunctival hyperemia.

Other common adverse reactions reported in 5-10% of patients were foreign body sensation, eye pain, photophobia, conjunctival hemorrhage, dry eye, eye irritation, intraocular pressure increased, corneal endothelial cell loss, vision blurred, iritis, and headache. ( 6.1 ) To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact AbbVie at 1-800-678-1605 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch.

6.1Clinical Trials Experience Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. The most common ocular adverse reaction observed in two randomized, active-controlled clinical trials with DURYSTA in patients with OAG or OHT was conjunctival hyperemia, which was reported in 27% of patients. Other common ocular adverse reactions reported in 5-10% of patients were foreign body sensation, eye pain, photophobia, conjunctival hemorrhage, dry eye, eye irritation, intraocular pressure increased, corneal endothelial cell loss, vision blurred, and iritis.

Ocular adverse reactions occurring in 1-5% of patients were anterior chamber cell, lacrimation increased, corneal edema, aqueous humor leakage, iris adhesions, ocular discomfort, corneal touch, iris hyperpigmentation, anterior chamber flare, anterior chamber inflammation, and macular edema. The following additional adverse drug reactions occurred in less than 1% of patients: hyphema, iridocyclitis, uveitis, corneal opacity, corneal thickening, product administered at inappropriate site, corneal decompensation, cystoid macular edema, and drug hypersensitivity.

The most common nonocular adverse reaction was headache, which was observed in 5% of patients.

6.2Postmarketing Experience The following adverse reactions have been identified during postapproval use of DURYSTA. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Eye disorders : endophthalmitis

👥 Use in Specific Populations ~2 min read ▾

8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

8.1Pregnancy Risk Summary There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of DURYSTA (bimatoprost intracameral implant) administration in pregnant women to inform a drug associated risk. Oral administration of bimatoprost to pregnant rats and mice throughout organogenesis did not produce adverse maternal or fetal effects at clinically relevant exposures. Oral administration of bimatoprost to rats from the start of organogenesis to the end of lactation did not produce adverse maternal, fetal or neonatal effects at clinically relevant exposures [see Animal Data] .

Data Animal Data In an embryofetal development rat study, oral administration of bimatoprost to pregnant rats during organogenesis produced abortion at 0.6 mg/kg/day (1770-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on C max and a blood-to plasma partition ratio of 0.858). The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for abortion was 0.3 mg/kg/day (estimated at 470-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on C max ). No fetal abnormalities were observed at doses up to 0.6 mg/kg/day.

In an embryofetal development mouse study, oral administration of bimatoprost to pregnant mice during organogenesis produced abortion and early delivery at 0.3 mg/kg/day (2240-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on plasma C max level; blood-to plasma partition ratio of 0.858). The NOAEL for abortion and early delivery was 0.1 mg/kg/day (400-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on C max ). No fetal abnormalities were observed at doses up to 0.6 mg/kg/day (5200-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on C max ).

In a pre/postnatal development study, oral administration of bimatoprost to pregnant rats from gestation day 7 through lactation resulted in reduced gestation length, increased late resorptions, fetal deaths, and postnatal pup mortality, and reduced pup body weight at 0.3 mg/kg/day (estimated 470-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based plasma C max and a blood-to plasma partition ratio of 0.858). No adverse effects were observed in rat offspring at 0.1 mg/kg/day (estimated 350-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on plasma C max ).

8.2Lactation Risk Summary There is no information regarding the presence of bimatoprost in human milk, the effects on the breastfed infants, or the effects on milk production. In animal studies, topical bimatoprost has been shown to be excreted in breast milk. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when DURYSTA is administered to a nursing woman.

The developmental and health benefits of breastfeeding should be considered, along with the mother's clinical need for DURYSTA and any potential adverse effects on the breastfed child from DURYSTA.

8.4Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness of DURYSTA in pediatric patients have not been established.

8.5Geriatric Use No overall differences in safety or effectiveness have been observed between elderly and other adult patients.

🤰 Pregnancy ~2 min read ▾

8.1Pregnancy Risk Summary There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of DURYSTA (bimatoprost intracameral implant) administration in pregnant women to inform a drug associated risk. Oral administration of bimatoprost to pregnant rats and mice throughout organogenesis did not produce adverse maternal or fetal effects at clinically relevant exposures. Oral administration of bimatoprost to rats from the start of organogenesis to the end of lactation did not produce adverse maternal, fetal or neonatal effects at clinically relevant exposures [see Animal Data] .

Data Animal Data In an embryofetal development rat study, oral administration of bimatoprost to pregnant rats during organogenesis produced abortion at 0.6 mg/kg/day (1770-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on C max and a blood-to plasma partition ratio of 0.858). The No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for abortion was 0.3 mg/kg/day (estimated at 470-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on C max ). No fetal abnormalities were observed at doses up to 0.6 mg/kg/day.

In an embryofetal development mouse study, oral administration of bimatoprost to pregnant mice during organogenesis produced abortion and early delivery at 0.3 mg/kg/day (2240-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on plasma C max level; blood-to plasma partition ratio of 0.858). The NOAEL for abortion and early delivery was 0.1 mg/kg/day (400-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on C max ). No fetal abnormalities were observed at doses up to 0.6 mg/kg/day (5200-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on C max ).

In a pre/postnatal development study, oral administration of bimatoprost to pregnant rats from gestation day 7 through lactation resulted in reduced gestation length, increased late resorptions, fetal deaths, and postnatal pup mortality, and reduced pup body weight at 0.3 mg/kg/day (estimated 470-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based plasma C max and a blood-to plasma partition ratio of 0.858). No adverse effects were observed in rat offspring at 0.1 mg/kg/day (estimated 350-times the human systemic exposure to bimatoprost from DURYSTA, based on plasma C max ).

🧒 Pediatric Use 15 words ▾

8.4Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness of DURYSTA in pediatric patients have not been established.

🧓 Geriatric Use 19 words ▾

8.5Geriatric Use No overall differences in safety or effectiveness have been observed between elderly and other adult patients.

🧬 Clinical Pharmacology 132 words ▾

12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

12.1Mechanism of Action Bimatoprost, a prostaglandin analog, is a synthetic structural analog of prostaglandin with ocular hypotensive activity. Bimatoprost is believed to lower IOP in humans by increasing outflow of aqueous humor through both the trabecular meshwork (conventional) and uveoscleral routes (unconventional). Elevated IOP presents a major risk factor for glaucomatous field loss.

The higher the level of IOP, the greater the likelihood of optic nerve damage and visual field loss.

12.3Pharmacokinetics After a single administration of DURYSTA, bimatoprost concentrations were below the lower limit of quantitation (0.001 ng/mL) in the majority (approximately 92%) of patients. The maximum bimatoprost concentration observed in any patient was 0.00224 ng/mL. Bimatoprost acid concentrations were also below the lower limit of quantitation (0.01 ng/mL) in almost all (approximately 99%) of patients.

🧬 Mechanism of Action 72 words ▾

12.1Mechanism of Action Bimatoprost, a prostaglandin analog, is a synthetic structural analog of prostaglandin with ocular hypotensive activity. Bimatoprost is believed to lower IOP in humans by increasing outflow of aqueous humor through both the trabecular meshwork (conventional) and uveoscleral routes (unconventional). Elevated IOP presents a major risk factor for glaucomatous field loss.

The higher the level of IOP, the greater the likelihood of optic nerve damage and visual field loss.

📦 How Supplied / Storage and Handling 39 words ▾

16 HOW SUPPLIED/STORAGE AND HANDLING DURYSTA contains a 10 mcg bimatoprost intracameral implant in a single-use applicator that is packaged in a sealed foil pouch containing desiccant, NDC 0023-9652-01. Storage Store refrigerated at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F).

📋 Description 158 words ▾

11 DESCRIPTION DURYSTA is a sterile intracameral implant containing 10 mcg of bimatoprost, a prostaglandin analog, in a solid polymer sustained-release drug delivery system (DDS). The drug delivery system consists of poly (D,L-lactide), poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide), poly (D,L-lactide) acid end, and polyethylene glycol 3350. DURYSTA is preloaded into a single-use, DDS applicator to facilitate injection of the rod-shaped implant directly into the anterior chamber of the eye.

The chemical name for bimatoprost is ( Z )-7-[(1 R ,2 R ,3 R ,5 S )-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(1 E ,3 S )-3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-1-pentenyl]cyclopentyl]- N -ethyl-5-heptenamide, and its molecular weight is 415.57. Its molecular formula is C 25 H 37 NO 4 . Its structural formula is: Bimatoprost is a white to off-white powder, soluble in ethyl alcohol and methyl alcohol and slightly soluble in water.

The polymer matrix slowly degrades to lactic acid and glycolic acid. The chemical name for bimatoprost is (Z)-7-[(1R,2R,3R,5S)-3,5-dihydroxy-2-[(1E,3S)-3-hydroxy-5-phenyl-1-pentenyl]cyclopentyl]-N-ethyl-5-heptenamide, and its molecular weight is 415.57. Its molecular formula is C25H37NO4.

💬 Information for Patients 139 words ▾

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION Treatment-related Effects Advise patients about the potential risk for complications including, but not limited to, the development of corneal adverse events, intraocular inflammation or endophthalmitis [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 , 5.4 , 5.6 )] . Potential for Pigmentation Advise patients about the potential for increased brown pigmentation of the iris, which may be permanent [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.5 )] . When to Seek Physician Advice Advise patients that if the eye becomes red, sensitive to light, painful, or develops a change in vision, they should seek immediate care from an ophthalmologist [ see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.6 )] .

Distributed by: AbbVie Inc. North Chicago, IL 60064 © 2024 AbbVie. All rights reserved.

DURYSTA and its design are trademarks of Allergan, Inc., an AbbVie company. V2.0USPI9652 Abbvie Logo

🧬 Pharmacokinetics 57 words ▾

12.3Pharmacokinetics After a single administration of DURYSTA, bimatoprost concentrations were below the lower limit of quantitation (0.001 ng/mL) in the majority (approximately 92%) of patients. The maximum bimatoprost concentration observed in any patient was 0.00224 ng/mL. Bimatoprost acid concentrations were also below the lower limit of quantitation (0.01 ng/mL) in almost all (approximately 99%) of patients.

🔬 Clinical Studies 94 words ▾

14 CLINICAL STUDIES Efficacy was evaluated in two multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, controlled 20-month (including 8-month extended follow-up) studies of DURYSTA compared to twice daily topical timolol 0.5% drops, in patients with OAG or OHT. DURYSTA demonstrated an IOP reduction of approximately 5-8 mmHg in patients with a mean baseline IOP of 24.5 mmHg (see Figures 3 and 4). Figure 3: Study 1 Mean IOP (mmHg) by Treatment Group and Treatment Difference in Mean IOP Figure 4: Study 2 Mean IOP (mmHg) by Treatment Group and Treatment Difference in Mean IOP Figure 3 Figure 4

🧪 Nonclinical Toxicology 117 words ▾

13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY

13.1Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility Carcinogenesis Bimatoprost was not carcinogenic in either mice or rats when administered by oral gavage at doses up to 2 mg/kg/day and 1 mg/kg/day respectively for 104 weeks (approximately 3100 and 1700 times, respectively, the maximum human exposure [based on plasma C max levels; blood-to-plasma partition ratio of 0.858]). Mutagenesis Bimatoprost was not mutagenic or clastogenic in the Ames test, in the mouse lymphoma test, or in the in vivo mouse micronucleus tests.

Impairment of Fertility Bimatoprost did not impair fertility in male or female rats up to doses of 0.6 mg/kg/day (1770-times the maximum human exposure, based on plasma C max ; blood-to-plasma partition ratio of 0.858).

📄 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility 114 words ▾

13.1Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility Carcinogenesis Bimatoprost was not carcinogenic in either mice or rats when administered by oral gavage at doses up to 2 mg/kg/day and 1 mg/kg/day respectively for 104 weeks (approximately 3100 and 1700 times, respectively, the maximum human exposure [based on plasma C max levels; blood-to-plasma partition ratio of 0.858]). Mutagenesis Bimatoprost was not mutagenic or clastogenic in the Ames test, in the mouse lymphoma test, or in the in vivo mouse micronucleus tests.

Impairment of Fertility Bimatoprost did not impair fertility in male or female rats up to doses of 0.6 mg/kg/day (1770-times the maximum human exposure, based on plasma C max ; blood-to-plasma partition ratio of 0.858).

📄 Package Label / Principal Display Panel 41 words ▾

PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL NDC 0023-9652-01 DURYSTA ® (bimatoprost intracameral implant) 10 mcg One Sterile, Single-Dose Applicator For Intracameral administration Rx only PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL NDC 0023-9652-01 DURYSTA® (bimatoprost intracameral implant) 10 mcg One Sterile, Single-Dose Applicator For Intracameral administration Rx only

Source: FDA Structured Product Labeling, mirrored from DailyMed / openFDA. Prefer the government’s original formatting? View this label on DailyMed ↗

Medicaid utilization & spend

📍 This exact package only: Medicaid data is reported per full 11-digit NDC — labeler, product and pack size — so every number here is for this package alone, not the drug overall. Other pack sizes report separately.
💊 Pharmacy benefit only: These are Medicaid outpatient pharmacy claims, billed by NDC. They exclude the medical benefit — clinic- or hospital-administered drugs billed under HCPCS J-codes — so drugs used mostly that way (e.g. Avastin, Lucentis, Keytruda) can look low or missing here. That’s expected, not an error.
📅 Q1 2025 – Q4 2025 · 4 quarters of data
ⓘ The newest quarter is usually incomplete when first published; states restate recent quarters in later CMS releases, so the latest figures typically revise upward. State coverage-policy changes can also shift quarter-to-quarter totals.
Prescriptions last 4 qtrs
501
Units reimbursed last 4 qtrs
505
Gross reimbursed last 4 qtrs
$862.2K
Avg / prescription
$1,721.05
Avg / unit
$1,708.44
Latest quarter Q4 2025
126Rx
Fee-for-service vs managed care ⓘ
70% FFS 30% MCO
Fee-for-service · 351 Rx Managed care · 150 Rx
State Medicaid map
Alaska: no data reported AK Maine: 10 units · 0.7 per 100k residents ME Washington: no data reported WA Idaho: no data reported ID Montana: no data reported MT North Dakota: no data reported ND Minnesota: no data reported MN Wisconsin: no data reported WI Michigan: no data reported MI New York: 66 units · 0.3 per 100k residents NY Vermont: no data reported VT New Hampshire: no data reported NH Oregon: no data reported OR Nevada: no data reported NV Wyoming: no data reported WY South Dakota: no data reported SD Iowa: no data reported IA Illinois: 14 units · 0.1 per 100k residents IL Indiana: no data reported IN Ohio: no data reported OH Pennsylvania: no data reported PA New Jersey: no data reported NJ Massachusetts: 91 units · 1.3 per 100k residents MA California: 93 units · 0.2 per 100k residents CA Utah: no data reported UT Colorado: no data reported CO Nebraska: no data reported NE Missouri: no data reported MO Kentucky: no data reported KY West Virginia: no data reported WV Virginia: no data reported VA Maryland: no data reported MD Connecticut: 72 units · 2.0 per 100k residents CT Rhode Island: no data reported RI Arizona: 11 units · 0.1 per 100k residents AZ New Mexico: no data reported NM Kansas: no data reported KS Arkansas: no data reported AR Tennessee: no data reported TN North Carolina: no data reported NC South Carolina: no data reported SC Delaware: no data reported DE Oklahoma: no data reported OK Louisiana: no data reported LA Mississippi: 21 units · 0.7 per 100k residents MS Alabama: no data reported AL Georgia: 84 units · 0.8 per 100k residents GA D.C.: no data reported DC Hawaii: no data reported HI Texas: no data reported TX Florida: 43 units · 0.2 per 100k residents FL
Units reimbursed · per 100k residents
0.12.0
gray = no data reported ⓘ
Colors are per 100,000 residents, so big states don’t automatically dominate. Tap or hover a state for its actual totals.
Tap or hover a state
…for its Medicaid breakdown
🏆 Top states by units · per 100k residents
1 Connecticut 2.0 /100k
2 Massachusetts 1.3 /100k
3 Georgia 0.8 /100k
4 Maine 0.7 /100k
5 Mississippi 0.7 /100k
6 New York 0.3 /100k
7 California 0.2 /100k
8 Florida 0.2 /100k
National units — by quarter
💵 About the dollar figures: “reimbursed” is what Medicaid paid pharmacies before confidential manufacturer rebates, so the program’s real net cost is lower than these numbers. Fee-for-service and managed-care claims are combined unless split above. Source: CMS State Drug Utilization Data; per-100k rates use 2023 Census population estimates.

Medicaid utilization by pack size

Medicaid (SDUD) totals over the four most recent reported quarters for every package size of this drug — handy when a specific package (e.g. a starter/titration pack) carries little or no Medicaid volume on its own.
1 implant this page00023-9652-01 501 Rx · $862,248
1 implant00023-9652-03 No Medicaid data
Drug total (last 4 qtrs): 501 Rx · 505 units · $862,248 gross reimbursed
Tap a pack size to open its page. Source: CMS State Drug Utilization Data, last 4 quarters.

Medicare Part D spend CMS · PART D · 2026 (Q1)

Medicare Part D (outpatient prescription) spending for Durysta — the program that covers self-administered drugs. 1 manufacturer.
⚠️ Drug-level data: CMS publishes Part D spending by drug, not by NDC — these figures combine every manufacturer, strength and package size sold under the name Durysta. That’s a different level of aggregation than the Medicaid card above, which is specific to this exact 11-digit NDC (pack size included), so the two aren’t directly comparable.
Period
Total Part D spend
$331K
Claims incl. refills
91
Beneficiaries
90
Spend / beneficiary
$3,677.83
Spend / claim
$3,637.42
Trend by period
💵 About the dollar figures: spending is what Part D plans paid before confidential manufacturer rebates, so the program’s real net cost is lower. A blank patient count means fewer than 11 people — CMS hides counts that small to protect privacy. Source: CMS Medicare Quarterly Part D Spending by Drug (data.cms.gov), updated quarterly.

About this NDC listing & data coverage

Finished prescription product
What data is (and isn’t) available for this NDC — tap to expand
NDC identity (package / product / labeler codes) ✓ Available
Labeler ✓ Available
Product & package description ✓ Available
Marketing category & status ✓ Available
Active ingredient / dosage form / route ✓ Available
FDA label (SPL via DailyMed) ✓ Available
Package photos ✓ Available
Inactive ingredients (structured) ✓ Available
NADAC pharmacy acquisition price (CMS) — Not published for this NDC CMS publishes NADAC only for NDCs reported in its retail-pharmacy survey.
Orange Book / therapeutic-equivalence data ✓ Available
HCPCS J-code billing crosswalk ✓ Available
Medicaid utilization (CMS SDUD) ✓ Available
“Not published” reflects what the public FDA / CMS / NLM sources provide for this exact package code — it is a property of the data feeds, not a judgment about the product.

Questions about this listing

Why is there no price listed?
The pricing shown on our NDC pages comes from CMS NADAC, a voluntary survey of retail community pharmacy invoices. CMS does not publish a NADAC for every NDC — packages outside the retail survey (institutional and hospital products, bulk packages, discontinued items, and many OTC items) may never receive one. A missing price reflects the survey's scope, not this product's actual cost, and does not mean the product is free or unavailable.
Is the NDC printed on the package the same as the 11-digit billing NDC?
Yes, they identify this exact package in different formats. The form printed on the packaging and shown on DailyMed is the one the FDA registered. Insurance claims use a fixed 11-digit 5-4-2 format, so the short segment is padded with a leading zero and the dashes are dropped. The Identity section at the top of this page lists each form of this code.
Is this package still being marketed?
Yes, per the latest FDA NDC Directory data on this page: this package is listed as actively marketed, with no marketing end date reported by Allergan, Inc.. Listing status can change — the directory data on this page refreshes weekly.
Does this product come in other package sizes?
Yes — the FDA directory lists 1 other package presentation of this same product, including 1 implant (00023-9652-03). Each has its own NDC and its own page — see the package list near the top of this page.
Who lists this product with the FDA?
Allergan, Inc. is the labeler of record for this NDC — the company under whose FDA-assigned code the package is listed. The labeler may be the manufacturer itself or a distributor marketing the product under its own code.
Do I need a prescription for this product?
This NDC is listed with FDA as a prescription product, so it is dispensed under a prescriber's order. Your pharmacist can tell you whether any over-the-counter forms of the same medication exist.
Does this product have a billing J-code?
Yes — this NDC cross-references HCPCS code J7351 for medical-claim billing (typically used when a product is administered in a clinical setting rather than dispensed at a retail pharmacy). See the Billing section on this page.
This page identifies an FDA-listed package (the NDC) and reports public regulatory and pricing data about the listing. It is reference information, not a medical recommendation — talk to your pharmacist or prescriber about your own medication.
Where does this data come from?
Listing facts (marketing category, packager status, marketing dates) from the FDA openFDA NDC Directory; label availability from DailyMed; pricing coverage from CMS NADAC; equivalence scope from the FDA Orange Book.
← 00023-9637-04 · Allergan, 00024-0654-01 · Sanofi-Aventis →
For educational and professional reference only — not medical advice. Pricing reflects published NADAC and CMS ASP (free public data) and may differ from your acquisition cost; always verify before billing or dispensing.