Pollens - Weeds and Garden Plants, Short Ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia .05 g/mL Injection, Solution, 5 mL — NDC 65044-2297-01 package photo
Label image from the product's FDA listing (DailyMed) — may show a different pack size or an older label revision.

Pollens - Weeds and Garden Plants, Short Ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia .05 g/mL Injection, Solution, 5 mL — NDC 65044-2297-1 (Billing 65044-2297-01)

by Jubilant HollisterStier LLC · 5 mL in 1 VIAL

This is a package of 5 mL of Pollens - Weeds and Garden Plants, Short Ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia .05 g/mL Injection, Solution from Jubilant HollisterStier LLC, marketed since Oct 1977 and currently FDA-listed. It is the main listing for this product, which comes in 3 package sizes.

NDC 65044-2297-01
🏷️ FDA NDC (as labeled) 65044-2297-1 billing pads the package segment with a zero
This package
Contains5 mL Pack sizes3 compare ↓
Main listing for product 65044-2297 · Also comes in: 10 ml 65044-2297-2 50 ml 65044-2297-4
Brand On market Non-controlled ⇄ Compare with another NDC
🗂️ FDA directory synced Oct 1, 2026 · this listing last changed Oct 2, 2026 · sources: openFDA · FDA label (DailyMed) · FDA Orange & Purple Book · First Databank · CMS NADAC, ASP, Medicare & Medicaid · RxNorm
📋 All sources & update times →

Identity & classification

Regulatory identifiers FDA, NLM and CMS codes for this package

FDA NDC (as labeled) 65044-2297-1
Product NDC 65044-2297
11-digit billing NDC 65044229701
Application # BLA103880
SPL Set ID 4801db3b-3738-49e0-b047-1bfb4f85349a
Established class (EPC) Standardized Pollen Allergenic Extract
Physiologic effect Cell-mediated Immunity; Increased Histamine Release; Increased IgG Production
Chemical class Allergens; Pollen
DEA schedule Non-controlled
Marketing category BLA
Marketing status On market
FDA listing status Listed (active directory)
Marketing start 1977-10-18
Route PERCUTANEOUS, SUBCUTANEOUS
Dosage form INJECTION, SOLUTION
Substance AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA POLLEN
Biologic (Purple Book) 351(a)
Why two NDCs? The FDA registers this code as 65044-2297-1 — a 5-4-1 layout, and that's what's printed on the package and shown on DailyMed. For insurance claims, every NDC is standardized to a uniform 11-digit 5-4-2 format by adding a zero to the package segment → 65044-2297-01. Same drug, same package — only the format differs.
Where does this data come from?
Identifiers from the FDA openFDA NDC Directory and Structured Product Labeling; RxCUI from RxNorm (NLM); GPI from Medi-Span; GCN / HIC / AHFS / legend from First Databank.

Clinical

Where does this data come from?
Plain-language summary from MedlinePlus (U.S. National Library of Medicine); supplement & herbal interactions and nutrient depletion data from the Natural Medicines database; our full guide is HelloPharmacist editorial content.

Pricing

A drug doesn't have one price. Each row is a different public payment system, and none is what you'd pay at the counter — that depends on your insurance. The ⓘ on each row explains what it measures.

Price systemPer mLPer package
Retail pharmacies payNADAC · weekly Not in the retail survey — common for institutional, discontinued, or low-volume packs.
Medicaid paysCMS SDUD · 12 mo No recent Medicaid claims on file for this NDC — rare and low-volume NDCs are suppressed in the public data.
Medicare drug plans payPart D · quarterly No Part D plan price is available for this NDC in our data.
ℹ️
No price is published for this exact package yet. CMS surveys NADAC per package size, so a different pack of the same drug often has one.
Try another pack size: 10 ml 50 ml
Where does this data come from?
NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost) is the CMS weekly pharmacy-acquisition-cost survey — what pharmacies pay. ASP (Average Sales Price) is the CMS Medicare Part B drug-payment file, published quarterly. Medicaid pays is computed by us from CMS State Drug Utilization Data (total reimbursed ÷ units, trailing 12 months) — gross of rebates and inclusive of dispensing fees, so it reflects what Medicaid paid, not an acquisition cost. Medicare drug plans pay is the median negotiated point-of-sale unit cost across plans listing this NDC in the CMS quarterly Prescription Drug Plan pricing files, before rebates. The VA pays is the federal contract price (FSS, and the statutory Big 4 ceiling where listed) from the VA National Acquisition Center pharmaceutical price file. All are free public government data; each measures a different payer, so the figures are not directly comparable.

Packaging — all sizes for this product

Package NDCDescription Marketing startMarketing endStatus
65044-2297-01 You're viewing this Main listing 5 mL in 1 VIAL 1977-10-18 — Active
65044-2297-02 65044-2297-2 10 mL in 1 VIAL 1977-10-18 — Active
65044-2297-04 65044-2297-4 50 mL in 1 VIAL 1977-10-18 — Active

You're viewing the smallest of 3 pack sizes for this product.

Pack size FAQ

What quantity is in this package?
This package contains 5 mL — 5 ml in 1 vial.
How does this package differ from NDC 65044-2297-02?
Both are Pollens - Weeds and Garden Plants, Short Ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia .05 g/mL Injection, Solution — the drug itself is identical. This page's package is the 5 mL one, while NDC 65044-2297-02 is the 10 ml package.
What NDC number is used to bill for this package of Pollens - Weeds and Garden Plants, Short Ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia .05 g/mL Injection, Solution?
Use the 11-digit billing form listed in the identifiers section of this page. Pharmacy and medical claims use the 11-digit form; the FDA label may print a shorter form of the same code.

Therapeutic equivalents

ProductLabelerPackNADAC/unitTEStatusPrice vs. this
Pollens - Weeds and Garden Plants, Short Ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia .05 g/mLthis 65044-2297-01 Jubilant 5 ml — — FDA listed —
About this product: this is a biologic. Biologics don't have small-molecule generics — competition comes from FDA-licensed biosimilars (shown above), not generics.
Where does this data come from?
Equivalents are other NDCs of the same ingredient, form and route from the openFDA NDC Directory, ranked least-expensive-first by NADAC. Therapeutic-equivalence (AB) ratings come from the FDA Orange Book; biologics use the FDA Purple Book for biosimilar & interchangeable status.

Availability & biosimilar status

🏛️
2024
First FDA approval
Mar 2024
📍
2026
Currently FDA-listed
2 years listed
🛡️
2036
Latest patent/protection listed
not a guaranteed launch date
🧬Biologic — competition comes from biosimilars

Biologics have no small-molecule generics; biosimilar competition is tracked in the FDA Purple Book.

🛡️ Latest patent/protection date listed: FDA patent/protection data lists protections through Mar 2036. This may affect when biosimilars become widely available, but it is not a guaranteed launch date.
📅 FDA approved Mar 13, 2024 ⏳ ~9.4 yr to latest listed protection

Why the date isn’t exact: Biosimilar timing can change because patents may be challenged, settled, licensed, added or removed, and litigation can move the real date earlier or later.

Patents & exclusivity — FDA Purple Book
Exclusivity RefProduct
2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036
Today
LOE
Biologic patent Exclusivity
🏛️Reference-product exclusivity
A flat 12 years of FDA market protection from first licensure. No biosimilar can be licensed before it ends — regardless of patents.
🧪Listed biologic patents
Patents the reference maker lists covering the molecule, formulation, or manufacturing. A biosimilar generally can’t launch until these resolve.
🔁Interchangeability
An interchangeable biosimilar may be substituted at the pharmacy (state laws vary). The first one can earn its own exclusivity period.
🛈 What do these terms mean?
Biologic patent
A patent the reference product’s maker has publicly listed. A biosimilar generally can’t launch until these expire — unless they’re invalidated or resolved in a settlement.
Reference-product exclusivity
A flat 12 years of FDA market protection from the biologic’s first licensure (the BPCIA). No biosimilar can be licensed before it ends, regardless of patents.
Interchangeable exclusivity
The first interchangeable biosimilar can earn a period as the only interchangeable version (pharmacists can substitute it without the prescriber).
Earliest biosimilar (LOE)
The latest of all the dates above — the soonest a biosimilar can realistically reach the market. Litigation and settlements can move it earlier.

Biologics have no small-molecule “generics” — competition comes from FDA-licensed biosimilars, tracked in the FDA Purple Book.

FDA exclusivity
CodeWhat it grantsExpires
RefProductReference-product exclusivity (12-year, BPCIA) — no biosimilar can be licensed before this dateMar 13, 2036
Common questions
Is there a biosimilar for this drug?
No FDA-licensed biosimilar is currently listed for this biologic in the FDA Purple Book.
Why do different websites show different biosimilar dates?
Biosimilar availability isn’t based on one single date. Some sources use the reference-product exclusivity, some use the last listed patent, and patent litigation, settlements, and licenses can all change the real-world launch date. This page shows the underlying Purple Book dates so you can see why estimates differ.
Can a biosimilar launch before the last patent expires?
Sometimes. A biosimilar maker may settle with the reference manufacturer or receive a license to launch earlier. In other cases, the last listed protection delays competition.
What does “current Purple Book estimate” mean?
It means we’re using the latest patent and exclusivity dates currently listed in the FDA Purple Book. It is not a guaranteed launch date.
What does “FDA listed” mean?
It means the product appears in the FDA’s official directory. That’s a good sign a product exists for the U.S. market, but on its own it does not confirm a pharmacy can get it today. Where we have recent retail pricing data, we label it “Availability likely” instead.
What does a patent or protection date mean here?
It’s the latest date currently listed in the FDA Purple Book for a patent or exclusivity on the reference biologic. It can affect when a biosimilar becomes widely available — but it is not a guaranteed launch date. Settlements and licenses can move the real date earlier or later.
Built from the FDA Purple Book Patent List (patents the reference-product sponsor has publicly listed under the BPCIA) plus reference-product exclusivity. Biosimilars cannot launch until these clear; patent litigation and settlements can shift the real date. Biologics have no small-molecule generics — competition comes from FDA-licensed biosimilars, not the Orange Book.
Where does this data come from?
Patents and exclusivity from the FDA Purple Book (biologics), refreshed from public FDA data. Biosimilar launch timing is an estimate, not a guarantee.

Inactive Ingredients / Excipients

Inactive ingredients, also called excipients, are components of the drug product other than the active ingredient. They may include fillers, dyes, coatings, preservatives, flavors, or other formulation ingredients.

💡 Tap an ingredient (hover on desktop) to see what it is and why it’s used.

  • UNII PDC6A3C0OX
    Glycerin is a clear, thick liquid derived from plant oils or fats. It acts as a humectant to retain moisture, a sweetener, and a solvent in medications.
  • UNII 8MDF5V39QO
    A white powder form of baking soda that acts as a buffer and pH regulator in medicines. It helps maintain the right acid-base balance and may aid tablet disintegration.
  • UNII 451W47IQ8X
    Sodium chloride is common table salt. It's used in medicines as a buffer to maintain proper pH, as a filler to add bulk, or to adjust the osmotic balance in liquid formulations.

3 inactive ingredients listed in the exact product block matched to this NDC.

Where does this data come from?
Data sourced from official FDA Structured Product Labeling (SPL) via DailyMed — ingredient classCode="IACT" elements from the exact product block matched by this NDC. Label-section narrative from DailyMed / the openFDA label index is shown separately when available.

Inactive ingredient FAQ

Are inactive ingredients the same for every manufacturer?
No. Inactive ingredients can differ by manufacturer, dosage form, strength, and package / product version.
Why might an inactive ingredient be missing?
Some SPLs do not provide a complete structured inactive-ingredient list, and older or unusual labels may only include the information in narrative text.
Can inactive ingredients matter?
Yes. They can matter for allergies, intolerances, dyes, gluten / lactose concerns, preservatives, and formulation differences — but confirm with a pharmacist or the manufacturer when it’s clinically important.

Manufacturer & labeler

LabelerJubilant HollisterStier LLC
FDA applicationBLA103880 (BLA)
Labeler code65044
First marketedOct 1977
Product typeStandardized Allergenic
Portfolio370 products on file
The labeler markets the product; the application holder owns the FDA approval. They’re often the same company but can differ (e.g. a repackager or an authorized generic). A mailing address / phone appears here when the manufacturer includes it in the product’s FDA label (not all do).
Where does this data come from?
Labeler, application holder and registered establishment from the FDA openFDA NDC Directory and Drugs@FDA; address/contact from the product’s FDA label.

Full FDA label FDA SPL

The complete FDA label for this product, verbatim, section by section. Very long sections are excerpted here and marked; the full text is on DailyMed (linked in the sources below). Jump with a chip, search within the label, or expand everything.
🚨 Boxed Warning ~3 min read ▾

WARNINGS This product is intended for use only by licensed medical personnel experienced in administering allergenic extracts and trained to provide immediate emergency treatment in the event of a life-threatening reaction. Allergenic extracts may potentially elicit a severe life-threatening systemic reaction, rarely resulting in death. 1 Therefore, emergency measures and personnel trained in their use must be available immediately in the event of such a reaction.

Patients should be instructed to recognize adverse reaction symptoms, be observed in the office for at least 30 minutes after skin testing or treatment, and be cautioned to contact the physician's office if symptoms occur. See ADVERSE REACTION section of this package insert regarding adverse event reporting. This product should never be injected intravenously.

Patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or pulmonary diseases such as symptomatic unstable, steroid-dependent asthma, and/or those who are receiving cardiovascular drugs such as beta blockers, may be at higher risk for severe adverse reactions. These patients may also be more refractory to the normal allergy treatment regimen. Patients should be treated only if the benefit of treatment outweighs the risks.

1 Patients on beta blockers may be more reactive to allergens given for testing or treatment and may be unresponsive to the actual doses of epinephrine used to treat allergic reactions. 2 Refer to the WARNINGS , PRECAUTIONS , ADVERSE REACTIONS and OVERDOSE Sections for further discussion.

IF CHANGING TO A DIFFERENT LOT OF EXTRACT: All extracts lose potency over time, and a fresh extract could have an effective potency that is substantially greater than that of the old extract. Even though it is the same formula and concentration, the first dose from the new vial should not exceed 50% of the previous dose. IF THE EXTRACT PREVIOUSLY USED WAS FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER: Since manufacturing processes and sources of raw materials differ among manufacturers, the interchangeability of extracts from different manufacturers cannot be insured.

The starting dose of the extract therefore should be greatly decreased even though the extract is the same formula and dilution. In general, a dose reduction of 50% of the previous product dose should be adequate, but each situation must be evaluated separately considering the patient's history of sensitivity, tolerance of previous injections, and other factors. If the patient tolerates a 50% decrease, the next dose could be raised to the previous dose amount.

If the decrease is greater than 50%, the next dose would need to be determined by the allergist, depending on the situation. Dose intervals should not exceed one week when rebuilding dose. See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION .

IF A PROLONGED PERIOD OF TIME HAS ELAPSED SINCE THE LAST INJECTION: Patients may lose tolerance for allergen injections during prolonged periods between doses. The duration of tolerance is an individual characteristic and varies from patient to patient. In general, the longer the lapse in the injection schedule, the greater dose reduction required.

If the interval since last dose is over four weeks, perform skin tests to determine starting dose. See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION . IF THE PREVIOUS EXTRACT WAS OUTDATED: The dating period for allergenic extracts indicates the time that they can be expected to remain potent under refrigerated storage conditions (2° - 8°C).

During the storage of extracts, even under ideal conditions, some loss of potency occurs. For this reason, extracts should not be used beyond their expiration date. If a patient has been receiving injections of an outdated extract, s/he may experience excessive local or systemic reactions when changed to a new and possibly more potent extract.

In general, the longer the material has been outdated, the greater the dose reduction necessary for the fresh extract. IF CHANGING FROM ALUM-ADSORBED TO AQUEOUS OR GLYCERINATED EXTRACTS: When the patient… [Excerpted — this section continues on DailyMed.]

🎯 Indications and Usage ~1 min read ▾

INDICATIONS AND USAGE 20, 21, 22, 23 Allergenic extracts are indicated for use in diagnosis and immunotherapy of patients presenting symptoms of allergy (hay fever, rhinitis, etc.) to specific environmental allergens. The selection of allergenic extracts to be used should be based on a thorough and carefully taken history of hypersensitivity, and confirmed by skin testing. 24, 25 The use of mixes of unrelated antigens for skin testing is not recommended since, in the case of a positive reaction, it does not indicate which component of the mix is responsible for the reaction; while, in the case of a negative reaction, it fails to indicate whether the individual antigens at full concentration would give a positive reaction.

Utilization of such mixes for compounding a treatment may result, in the former case, in administering unnecessary antigens and, in the latter case, in the omission of a needed antigen. Statistically controlled blind studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of therapy with Amb a 1. 26 However, double blind studies have demonstrated a greater effectiveness for whole Short Ragweed extract when compared to Amb a 1 alone.

27 Short Ragweed Extracts, standardized on the basis of Amb a 1 extract, would seem to be a logical choice for immunotherapy. Allergens to which a patient is extremely sensitive should not be included in treatment mixes with allergens to which there is much less sensitivity, but should be administered separately. This allows individualized and better control of dosage increases, including adjustments in dosage becoming necessary after severe reactions which may occur to the highly reactive allergen.

⏱️ Dosage and Administration ~3 min read ▾

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION 21, 22, 23 1. General Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration whenever solution and container permit. Sterile aqueous diluent containing human serum albumin [Albumin Saline with Phenol (0.4%)] or diluent of 50% glycerin may be used when preparing dilutions of the concentrate for immunotherapy.

For intradermal testing dilutions, Albumin Saline with Phenol (0.4%) is recommended. Dilutions should be made accurately and aseptically, using sterile diluent, vials, syringes, etc. Mix thoroughly and gently by rocking or swirling.

Maintain stock solutions and dilutions constantly at 2° - 8°C. 2. Pediatric Use The dose for the pediatric population is the same as for adults.

(See PRECAUTIONS .) 3. Geriatric Use The dose for the elderly patients is the same as for adult patients under 65. 40 4.

Diagnosis A positive reaction consists of an urticarial wheal with surrounding erythema (resembling somewhat a mosquito bite reaction) larger than the control site. The smallest reaction considered positive is erythema with a central papule at least 5 mm in diameter, however certain skin test devices may elicit a smaller positive reaction. Check the device manufacturer's recommendations.

In some instances with no reaction at the control site, erythema may be considered an indication of sensitivity. A positive skin reaction to any allergen must be interpreted in light of the patient's history of symptoms, time of year, and known exposures. THE SKIN TESTS ARE IN NO WAY A SUBSTITUTE FOR A CAREFUL ALLERGIC HISTORY.

THEY SERVE AS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO AID IN IDENTIFYING CAUSATIVE ALLERGENS IN PATIENTS WITH ALLERGIC DISORDERS. Skin tests are graded in terms of the wheal and erythema response noted at 15 minutes. Wheal and erythema size may be recorded by actual measurement of the extent of both responses.

Refer to the following table to determine the skin test sensitivity class. The corresponding ∑E (sum of the longest diameter and the mid-point orthogonal diameters of erythema) is also presented. Class Wheal Diameter Erythema Diameter Corresponding ∑E 0 < 5 mm <5 mm <10 mm ± 5-10 mm 5-10 mm 10-20 mm 1+ 5-10 mm 11-20 mm 20-40 mm 2+ 5-10 mm 21-30 mm 40-60 mm 3+ 10-15 mm a 31-40 mm 60-80 mm 4+ >15 mm b >40 mm >80 mm a. or with pseudopods b. or with many pseudopods a.

Scratch, Prick or Puncture Testing To identify highly sensitive individuals and as a safety precaution, it is recommended that a scratch, prick or puncture test using a drop of the extract concentrate be performed prior to initiating intradermal testing. Short Ragweed extract at 1:20 w/v in 50% glycerin containing approximately 100 to 300 units of Amb a 1/mL or Giant and Short Ragweed Mix at 1:20 w/v in 50% glycerin containing approximately 50 to 150 units of Amb a 1/mL are usually used for scratch, prick or puncture testing.

Scratch tests are performed by first scarifying the skin, then applying the extract to the scratch. Prick tests are performed by placing a drop of extract on the skin and piercing through the drop into the skin with a slight lifting motion. The prick is superficial and should not draw blood.

Puncture tests are performed by placing a drop of extract on the skin and piercing through the drop perpendicular to the skin with a device such as a Prick Lancetter. After about 1 minute the extract may be wiped away with a dry sponge. The diameter of wheal and erythema reactions are measured 15 minutes after the scratch, prick or puncture is made, and the sensitivity class of the patient determined by the table presented at the end of the diagnosis section.

Less sensitive individuals (Class 0 to 1+) can be tested intradermally with the recommended dilutions of the extract concentrate (see Intradermal Testing ) b. Intradermal Testing Intradermal tests should be done only on patients with a negative scratch, prick or puncture test. Patients who do not react to a valid scratch,… [Excerpted — this section continues on DailyMed.]

⛔ Contraindications 193 words ▾

CONTRAINDICATIONS There are no known absolute contraindications to immunotherapy. See PRECAUTIONS and WARNINGS . Patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or pulmonary diseases such as symptomatic unstable, steroid-dependent asthma, and/or those who are receiving cardiovascular drugs such as beta blockers, may be at higher risk for severe adverse reactions.

These patients may also be more refractory to the normal allergy treatment regimen. Patients should be treated only if the benefit of treatment outweighs the risks. 1 Treat patients only with allergens to which they are allergic by skin test reaction, have a history of symptoms on exposure, and are likely to be exposed to again.

Any injections, including immunotherapy, should be avoided in patients with a bleeding tendency. Patients on beta blockers may be more reactive to allergens given for testing or treatment and may be unresponsive to the usual doses of epinephrine used to treat systemic reactions. 2 Since there are differences of opinion concerning the possibility of routine immunizations exacerbating autoimmune diseases, immunotherapy should be given cautiously to patients with other immunologic diseases and only if the risk from exposure to the allergen is greater than the risk of exacerbating the underlying disorder.

⚠️ Warnings ~3 min read ▾

WARNINGS See WARNINGS box at the beginning of this package insert. See also PRECAUTIONS . Allergenic extracts must be temporarily withheld from patients or the dose adjusted downward if any of the following conditions exist: (1) severe symptoms of rhinitis and/or asthma; (2) infection or flu accompanied by fever; (3) any evidence of an excessively large local or generalized reaction during the initial stages of immunotherapy or during maintenance therapy, and/or (4) exposure to excessive amounts of clinically relevant allergen prior to a scheduled injection.

Do not administer immunotherapy during a period of symptoms due to exposure. Since the individual components of the extract are those to which the patient is allergic, and to which s/he will be exposed, typical allergic symptoms may follow shortly after the injection, particularly when the antigen load from exposure plus the injected antigen exceeds the patient's antigen tolerance. THE CONCENTRATE MUST NOT BE INJECTED AT ANY TIME UNLESS TOLERANCE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.

DILUTE CONCENTRATED EXTRACTS WITH STERILE DILUENT FOR INTRADERMAL TESTING AND IMMUNOTHERAPY. INJECTIONS MUST NEVER BE GIVEN INTRAVENOUSLY. Subcutaneous injection is recommended.

Intracutaneous or intramuscular injection may produce large local reactions or be excessively painful. AFTER INSERTING NEEDLE SUBCUTANEOUSLY, BUT BEFORE INJECTING, ALWAYS WITHDRAW THE PLUNGER SLIGHTLY. IF BLOOD APPEARS IN THE SYRINGE, CHANGE NEEDLE AND GIVE THE INJECTION IN ANOTHER SITE.

IF CHANGING TO A DIFFERENT LOT OF EXTRACT: All extracts lose potency over time, and a fresh extract could have an effective potency that is substantially greater than that of the old extract. Even though it is the same formula and concentration, the first dose from the new vial should not exceed 50% of the previous dose. IF THE EXTRACT PREVIOUSLY USED WAS FROM ANOTHER MANUFACTURER: Since manufacturing processes and sources of raw materials differ among manufacturers, the interchangeability of extracts from different manufacturers cannot be insured.

The starting dose of the extract therefore should be greatly decreased even though the extract is the same formula and dilution. In general, a dose reduction of 50% of the previous product dose should be adequate, but each situation must be evaluated separately considering the patient's history of sensitivity, tolerance of previous injections, and other factors. If the patient tolerates a 50% decrease, the next dose could be raised to the previous dose amount.

If the decrease is greater than 50%, the next dose would need to be determined by the allergist, depending on the situation. Dose intervals should not exceed one week when rebuilding dose. See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION .

IF A PROLONGED PERIOD OF TIME HAS ELAPSED SINCE THE LAST INJECTION: Patients may lose tolerance for allergen injections during prolonged periods between doses. The duration of tolerance is an individual characteristic and varies from patient to patient. In general, the longer the lapse in the injection schedule, the greater dose reduction required.

If the interval since last dose is over four weeks, perform skin tests to determine starting dose. See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION . IF THE PREVIOUS EXTRACT WAS OUTDATED: The dating period for allergenic extracts indicates the time that they can be expected to remain potent under refrigerated storage conditions (2° - 8°C).

During the storage of extracts, even under ideal conditions, some loss of potency occurs. For this reason, extracts should not be used beyond their expiration date. If a patient has been receiving injections of an outdated extract, s/he may experience excessive local or systemic reactions when changed to a new and possibly more potent extract.

In general, the longer the material has been outdated, the greater the dose reduction necessary for the fresh extract. IF CHANGING FROM ALUM-ADSORBED TO AQUEOUS OR GLYCERINATED EXTRACTS: When the patient previously has been receiving… [Excerpted — this section continues on DailyMed.]

🤒 Adverse Reactions ~3 min read ▾

ADVERSE REACTIONS Physicians administering allergenic extract testing or treatment materials should be experienced in the treatment of severe systemic reactions. See WARNINGS box at the beginning of this package insert. 1.

Local Reactions Some erythema, swelling, or pruritus at the site of injection are common, the extent varying with the patient. Such reactions should not be considered significant unless they persist for at least 24 hours. Local reactions (erythema or swelling) which exceed 4-5 cm in diameter are not only uncomfortable, but also indicate the possibility of a systemic reaction if dosage is increased.

In such cases the dosage should be reduced to the last level not causing the reaction and maintained at this level for two or three treatments before cautiously increasing again. Large, persistent local reactions may be treated by local cold, wet dressings and/or the use of oral antihistamines. They should be considered a warning of possible severe systemic reactions and the need for temporarily reduced dosages.

A mild burning immediately after the injection is to be expected; this usually subsides in 10 to 20 seconds. 2. Systemic Reactions With careful attention to dosage and administration, systemic reactions occur infrequently, but it cannot be overemphasized that in sensitive individuals any injection could result in anaphylactic shock.

Therefore, it is imperative that physicians administering allergenic extracts understand and be prepared for the treatment of severe reactions. Most severe systemic reactions will begin within a 30 minute time period, but systemic reactions may occur at any time after skin tests or immunotherapy. Symptoms may range from mild to life-threatening (due to anaphylaxis) as described below.

Other possible systemic reaction symptoms which may occur in varying degrees of severity are laryngeal edema, fainting, pallor, bradycardia, hypotension, angioedema, cough, wheezing, conjunctivitis, rhinitis, and urticaria. Adverse reaction frequency data for allergenic extract administration for testing and treatment show that risk is low. 1, 41 If a systemic or anaphylactic reaction does occur, apply a tourniquet above the site of injection and inject 1:1000 epinephrine-hydrochloride intramuscularly into the opposite arm.

Loosen the tourniquet at least every 10 minutes. Do not obstruct arterial blood flow with the tourniquet. EPINEPHRINE DOSAGE ADULT: 0.3 to 0.5 mL should be injected.

Repeat in 5 to 10 minutes if necessary. PEDIATRIC : The usual initial dose is 0.01 mg (mL) per kg body weight or 0.3 mg (mL) per square meter of body surface area. Suggested dosage for infants to 2 years of age is 0.05 mL to 0.1 mL; for children 2 to 6 years, 0.15 mL; and children 6 to 12 years, 0.2 mL.

Single pediatric doses should not exceed 0.3 mg (mL). Doses may be repeated as frequently as every 20 minutes, depending on the severity of the condition and the response of the patient. After administration of epinephrine, profound shock or vasomotor collapse should be treated with intravenous fluids, and possibly vasoactive drugs.

Airway patiency should be insured. Oxygen should be given by mask. Intravenous antihistamine, inhaled bronchodilators, theophylline, and/or adrenal corticosteroids may be used if necessary after adequate epinephrine and circulatory support have been given.

Emergency resuscitation measures and personnel trained in their use must be available immediately in the event of a serious systemic or anaphylactic reaction not responsive to the above measures [ Ref. J. Allergy and Clinical Immunology 77(2): p.

271-273, 1986]. Rarely are all of the above measures necessary; the tourniquet and epinephrine usually produce prompt responses. However, the physician should be prepared in advance for all contingencies.

Promptness in beginning emergency treatment measures is of utmost importance. Severe systemic reactions mandate a decrease of at least 50% in the next dose, followed by cautious increases. Re… [Excerpted — this section continues on DailyMed.]

🔄 Drug Interactions ~1 min read ▾

3. Drug Interactions Patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or pulmonary diseases such as symptomatic unstable, steroid-dependent asthma, and/or those who are receiving cardiovascular drugs such as beta blockers, may be at higher risk for severe adverse reactions. These patients may also be more refractory to the normal allergy treatment regimen.

Patients should be treated only if the benefit of treatment outweighs the risks. 1 Patients on beta blockers may be more reactive to allergens given for testing or treatment and may be unresponsive to the usual doses of epinephrine used to treat allergic reactions. 2 (See WARNINGS .) Certain medications may lessen the skin test wheal and erythema responses elicited by allergens and histamine for varying time periods.

Conventional antihistamines should be discontinued at least 5 days before skin testing. Long acting antihistamines should be discontinued for at least 3 weeks prior to skin testing. 32 Topical steroids should be discontinued at the skin test site for at least 2-3 weeks before skin testing.

32, 33 Tricyclic antidepressants such as Doxepin should be withheld for at least 7 days before skin testing. 34 Topical local anesthetics may suppress flare responses and should be avoided in skin test sites. 35 When using other drugs in patients receiving allergenic extracts, always consult the product labeling of the other drugs to determine any possible interaction with use of allergenic extracts.

🤰 Pregnancy 134 words ▾

5. Pregnancy Pregnancy Category C . Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with allergenic extracts.

It is also not known whether allergenic extracts can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity. Allergenic extracts should be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed. The physician must carefully consider the benefit-to-risk ratio to both patient and fetus, of performing skin testing or continuing immunotherapy during pregnancy.

The recommended precautions (See WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS ) for preventing adverse reactions are especially important in the pregnant patient. Based on the physician's discretion, immunotherapy maintenance doses may be continued during pregnancy if the patient has not experienced adverse side effects. Immunotherapy is generally not initiated during pregnancy due to the risks associated with systemic reactions and their treatment.

37

🧒 Pediatric Use 49 words ▾

7. Pediatric Use Since dosage for children is the same as for adults, 38, 39 larger volumes of solution may produce excessive discomfort. Therefore, in order to achieve the total dose required, the volume of the dose may need to be divided into more than one injection per visit.

🧓 Geriatric Use 65 words ▾

8. Geriatric Use The reactions from immunotherapy can be expected to be the same in elderly patients as in younger ones. Elderly patients may be more likely to be on medication that could block the effect of epinephrine which could be used to treat serious reactions, or they could be more sensitive to the cardiovascular side effect of epinephrine because of pre-existing cardiovascular disease. 40

🆘 Overdosage 5 words ▾

OVERDOSAGE See ADVERSE REACTIONS .

🧬 Clinical Pharmacology 169 words ▾

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY The mechanism by which hyposensitization is achieved is not known completely. It has been shown that repeated injections of appropriate allergenic extracts will ameliorate the intensity of allergic symptoms upon contact with the allergen .10, 11, 12, 13 Clinical studies which address the efficacy of immunotherapy are available. The allergens which have been studied are cat, mite, venoms, and some pollen extracts.

9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 IgE antibodies bound to receptors on mast cell membranes are required for the allergic reaction, and their level is probably related to serum IgE concentrations. Immunotherapy has been associated with decreased levels of IgE, and also with increases in allergen specific IgG "blocking" antibody. The histamine release response of circulating basophils to a specific allergen is reduced in some patients by hyposensitization, but the mechanism of this change is not clear.

Further study and clarification of the relationships among changes in blocking antibody, reaginic antibody, and mediator-releasing cells, and between these three factors and successful immunotherapy, is needed.

📦 How Supplied / Storage and Handling 88 words ▾

HOW SUPPLIED Scratch, Prick or Puncture Test extracts are supplied in 5 mL dropper bottles at 1:20 w/v and are preserved with glycerin. Intradermal extracts are supplied in multiple dose 5 mL vials at a concentration of 500 PNU/mL, and are preserved with phenol. Treatment sets are supplied as ordered by the physician. "Bulk" extracts are preserved with glycerin and are supplied in 10, 30 and 50 mL multidose vials at the w/v or PNU/mL ordered by the physician.

Please see the current catalog or professional price list.

📦 Storage and Handling 78 words ▾

STORAGE The expiration date is listed on the container label. To insure the maximum potency of Short Ragweed extract and its dilutions, it is recommended that the product be maintained at a temperature of 2° - 8°C at all times, even during use. Dilutions are less stable than the Concentrate.

If loss of potency is suspected, the product should be checked by skin testing with equal units of a freshly prepared dilution on known ragweed pollen allergic individuals.

📋 Description ~2 min read ▾

DESCRIPTION The sterile Short Ragweed or Giant and Short Ragweed Mix Allergenic Extract in this vial may be supplied for scratch, prick or puncture testing; intradermal testing; treatment; or as a "bulk" extract which is designed primarily for the physician equipped to prepare dilutions and mixtures as required. Each concentrated lot of Short Ragweed and Giant and Short Ragweed Mix is assayed for Amb a 1 3 (also known as Antigen E) and submitted to the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research for official release The Amb a 1 concentrations for dilutions of extracts greater than 1:20 w/v have been obtained by calculation from the assayed value.

The following is a brief description of the three expressions of concentration applied to these extracts. 1. Weight to volume (w:v).

The amount of allergenic source material added to the extracting fluid. A 1:20 extract indicates that the solution contains the extractable material from one gram of raw material added to each 20 mL of extracting fluid. The amount and composition of extracted materials will vary with the kind of antigen, the extracting fluid, duration of extraction, pH, temperature, and other variables.

2. Protein Nitrogen Units (PNU). One protein nitrogen unit represents 0.00001 mg phosphotungstic acid precipitable protein nitrogen dis solved in one mL of antigen extract.

The PNU content of extracts of the same antigen may vary according to the method of measuring the PNU. Thus, the PNU content of extracts from different manufacturers is not comparable unless the PNU method is known to be the same and is reproducible from lot to lot. Also, the amount of protein nitrogen extracted from an antigen is influenced by the same variables as the weight to volume extract.

Allergenic materials make up a variable proportion of the total protein of an extract. 3. Of the many allergens from Short Ragweed which have been purified and characterized (Amb a 1, Amb a 2 3 (also known as Antigen K),Ra-3 4 , Ra-4 (BPA-R) 5, Ra-56, Ra6, Ra 7 and Ra8 7, and cytochrome C 8 ), Amb a 1 is considered the most important and has been selected as the basis for standardization.

Extracts of Short Ragweed containing Amb a 1 are diffused in agar against standard anti-serum to Amb a 1, and compared to the diffusion of standard Amb a 1 solutions. The amount of Amb a 1 is expressed as units of Amb a 1 per mL of extract. Amb a 1 units are approximately equal to micrograms previously used to measure Amb a 1 concentration.

The Amb a 1 assay therefore provides an absolute measure of extract potency related to the Amb a 1 antigen in Short Ragweed, rather than only an expression of extract strength. Ingredients: Active ingredients are the allergen(s) noted on the vial label. Preservative is 50% (v/v) glycerin or 0.4% phenol, as indicated on the vial label.

Glycerinated extracts contain 0.5% sodium chloride, 0.275% sodium bicarbonate and 50% glycerin (v/v) as a preservative. Non-glycerinated extracts contain 0.5% sodium chloride, 0.275% sodium bicarbonate and 0.4% phenol (w/v) as a preservative.

💬 Information for Patients 89 words ▾

2. Information for Patients Patients should be instructed in the recognition of adverse reactions to immunotherapy, and in particular, to the symptoms of shock. (See WARNINGS box at the beginning of this package insert.) Patients should be made to understand the importance of a 30 minute observation period following skin testing or therapeutic injections, and be cautioned to return to the office promptly if symptoms occur after leaving.

Patients should be instructed to report any symptoms of exposure to the allergen, so the physician can adjust the dosage appropriately.

⚠️ Precautions ~3 min read ▾

PRECAUTIONS 1. General The presence of asthmatic signs and symptoms appear to be an indicator for severe reactions following allergy injections. An assessment of airway obstruction either by measurement of peak flow or an alternate procedure may provide a useful indicator as to the advisability of administering an allergy injection.

1, 28, 29, 30, 31 Concentrated extracts must not be injected unless tolerance has been established. Concentrated extracts must be diluted prior to use. See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION for detailed instructions on the dilution of allergenic extracts.

Any evidence of a local or generalized reaction requires a reduction in dosage during the initial stages of immunotherapy, as well as during maintenance therapy. Allergenic extracts diluted with sterile Albumin Saline with Phenol (0.4%) may be more potent than extracts diluted with diluents which do not contain stabilizers. When changing from non-stabilized to stabilized diluent, consider weaker initial dilutions for both intradermal testing and immunotherapy.

Dilutions for both intradermal testing and immunotherapy. Sterile solutions, vials, syringes, etc., should be used and aseptic precautions observed in making dilutions. To avoid cross-contamination, do not use the same needle to withdraw materials from vials of more than one extract, or extract followed by diluent.

A sterile tuberculin syringe graduated in 0.01 mL units and with a needle at least 5/8" long should be used to measure each dose from the appropriate dilution. Aseptic techniques should always be employed when injections of allergenic extracts are being administered. A separate sterile syringe should be used for each patient to prevent transmission of hepatitis and other infectious agents from one person to another.

Patient reactions to previous injections should be reviewed before each new injection, so that dosage can be adjusted accordingly. See ADVERSE REACTIONS and WARNINGS . Rarely, a patient is encountered who develops systemic reactions to minute doses of allergen and does not demonstrate increasing tolerance to injections after several months of treatment.

If systemic reactions or excessive local responses occur persistently at very small doses, efforts at immunotherapy should be stopped. PATIENTS SHOULD BE OBSERVED IN THE OFFICE FOR AT LEAST 30 MINUTES AFTER SKIN TESTING AND EACH TREATMENT INJECTION. Most severe reactions will occur within this time period, and rapid treatment measures should be instituted.

See ADVERSE REACTIONS for these treatment measures. 2. Information for Patients Patients should be instructed in the recognition of adverse reactions to immunotherapy, and in particular, to the symptoms of shock.

(See WARNINGS box at the beginning of this package insert.) Patients should be made to understand the importance of a 30 minute observation period following skin testing or therapeutic injections, and be cautioned to return to the office promptly if symptoms occur after leaving. Patients should be instructed to report any symptoms of exposure to the allergen, so the physician can adjust the dosage appropriately. 3.

Drug Interactions Patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or pulmonary diseases such as symptomatic unstable, steroid-dependent asthma, and/or those who are receiving cardiovascular drugs such as beta blockers, may be at higher risk for severe adverse reactions. These patients may also be more refractory to the normal allergy treatment regimen. Patients should be treated only if the benefit of treatment outweighs the risks.

1 Patients on beta blockers may be more reactive to allergens given for testing or treatment and may be unresponsive to the usual doses of epinephrine used to treat allergic reactions. 2 (See WARNINGS .) Certain medications may lessen the skin test wheal and erythema responses elicited by allergens and histamine for varying time periods. Conventional antihistamines should be discontinued at least 5 days before skin testing.

Long actin… [Excerpted — this section continues on DailyMed.]

🍼 Nursing Mothers 46 words ▾

6. Nursing Mothers There are no current studies on the secretion of allergenic extract components in human milk or their effect on the nursing infant. Because many drugs are excreted in human milk, caution should be exercised when allergenic extracts are administered to a nursing woman.

📄 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility 28 words ▾

4. Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility Long-term studies in animals have not been conducted with allergenic extracts to determine their potential for carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or impairment of fertility.

📚 References ~3 min read ▾

REFERENCES 1. Lockey, R.F., L.M. Benedict, P.C.

Turkeltaub, S.C. Bukantz. Fatalities from immunotherapy (IT) and skin testing (ST).

J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

79 (4): 660-677, April 1987. 2. Jacobs, R.L., G.W.

Rake, Jr. et al. Potentiated anaphylaxis in patients with drug induced beta-adrenergic blockade. J.

Allergy and Clin. Immunol. 68 (2): 125-127, August 1981.

3. Griffith, I.J., J. Pollock, D.G.

Klapper, B.L. Rogers and A.K. Nault,.

Sequence Polymorphism of Amb a I and Amb a II, the Major Allergens in Ambrosia artemisiifolia (Short Ragweed). Int. Arch.

Allergy Apply. Immunol., 96: 296-304, 1991. 4.

Underdown, B.J. and L. Goodfriend. Isolation and characterization of an allergen from short ragweed pollen.

Biochem. 8 (3): 980-989, 1969. 5.

Griffiths, B.W. and R. Brunet. Isolation of a basic protein antigen of low ragweed pollen.

Can. J. Biochem.

49 (3): 396-400, 1971. 6. Lapkoff, C.B. and L.

Goodfriend. Isolation of a low molecular weight ragweed allergen: Ra-5. Int.

Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol.

46 (2): 215-229, 1974. 7. Hussain, R. and D.G.

Marsh. Characterization and allergenic activity of ragweed allergens Ra-6, Ra-7, Ra-8. J.

Allergy Clin. Immunol. 65 (3): 230, abstr.

218, 1980. 8. Goodfriend, L., A.M.

Choudhury, J. Del Carpio and T.P. King.

Cytochrome C: New ragweed pollen allergen. Fed. Proc.

38 (3, part II): 1415, abstr. 6261, 1979. 9.

Norman, P.S. Postgraduate Course Presentation. An overview of immunotherapy, implications for the future.

J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.

65 (2): 87-96, 1980. 10. Lowell, F.C., W.

Franklin. A "double-blind" study of treatment with aqueous allergenic extracts in cases of allergic rhinitis. J.

Allergy 34 (2): 165-182, 1983. 11. Lowell, F.C., W.

Franklin. A double-blind study of the effectiveness and specificity of injection therapy in ragweed hay fever. N.

Eng. J. Med.

273 (13): 675-679, 1965. 12. Zavazal, V., A.

Stajner. Immunologic changes during specific treatment of the atopic state. II.

Acta. Allergol. 25 (1): 11-17, 1970.

13. Reisman, R.E., J.I. Wypych, E.E.

Arbesman. Relationships of immunotherapy, seasonal pollen exposure and clinical response to serum concentrations of total IgE and ragweed-specific IgE. Int.

Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol.

48 (6): 721-730, 1975. 14. Chapman, M.D., T.A.E.

Platts-Mills, M. Gabriel, H.K. Ng, W.G.L.

Allen, L.E. Hill, A.J. Nunn.

Antibody response following prolonged hyposensitization with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus extract. Int. Arch.

Allergy Appl. Immunol. 61: 431-440, 1980.

15. Norman, P.S., W.L. Winkenwerder.

Maintenance immunotherapy in ragweed hay fever. J. Allergy 74: 273-282, 1971.

16. Norman, P.S., W.L. Winkenwerder, L.M.

Lichtenstein. Immunotherapy of hay fever with ragweed Antigen E; comparisons with whole pollen extract and placebos. J.Allergy 42: 93-108, 1968.

17. Ohman, J.L., S.R. Findlay, K.

Leiterman. Immunotherapy in cat-induced asthma: double-blind trial with evaluation of in vivo and vitro responses. J.

Allergy Clin. Immunol. 74: 230, 1984.

18. Sundin, B., G. Lilja, V.

Graff-Lonnevig, G. Hedlin, H. Heilborn, K.

Norrlind, K-O Pegelow, and H. Lowenstein. Immunotherapy with partially purified and standardized animal dander extracts.

I Clinical results from a double-blind study on patients with animal dander asthma. J. Allergy Clin.

Immunol. 77: 478, 1986. 19.

Hunt, K.J., Valentine, M.D., Sobotka, A.K., Benton, A.W., Amodio, F.J., and Lichtenstein, L.M. A controlled trial of immunotherapy in insect hypersensitivity. New Eng.

J. Med. 299: 157-161, July 27, 1978.

20. Middleton, E., C.E. Reed and E.F.

Ellis (Eds.). Allergy Principles and Practice. C.V.

Mosby Co., St. Louis, 1978, pp. 877-898.

21. Sheldon, J.M., R.G. Lovell and K.P.

Mathews. A Manual of Clinical Allergy, Second Edition, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1967, pp.

107-112. 22. Sherman, W.B.

Hypersensitivity Mechanism and Management. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, 1968, pp.

169-172. 23. Swineford, O.

Asthma and Hay Fever. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1971, pp.

148-155. 24. Pauli, G… [Excerpted — this section continues on DailyMed.]

📄 Package Label / Principal Display Panel 3 words ▾

Example Vial Label

Source: FDA Structured Product Labeling, mirrored from DailyMed / openFDA. Prefer the government’s original formatting? View this label on DailyMed ↗

About this NDC listing & data coverage

What data is (and isn’t) available for this NDC — tap to expand
NDC identity (package / product / labeler codes) ✓ Available
Labeler ✓ Available
Product & package description ✓ Available
Marketing category & status ✓ Available
Active ingredient / dosage form / route ✓ Available
FDA label (SPL via DailyMed) ✓ Available
Package photos ✓ Available
Inactive ingredients (structured) ✓ Available
NADAC pharmacy acquisition price (CMS) — Not published for this NDC CMS publishes NADAC only for NDCs reported in its retail-pharmacy survey.
Orange Book / therapeutic-equivalence data ✓ Available
HCPCS J-code billing crosswalk — Not published for this NDC Most self-administered / retail products have no J-code — that is normal.
Medicaid utilization (CMS SDUD) — Not published for this NDC CMS reports utilization only for NDCs with Medicaid claims above its privacy threshold.
“Not published” reflects what the public FDA / CMS / NLM sources provide for this exact package code — it is a property of the data feeds, not a judgment about the product.

Questions about this listing

Why is there no price listed?
The pricing shown on our NDC pages comes from CMS NADAC, a voluntary survey of retail community pharmacy invoices. CMS does not publish a NADAC for every NDC — packages outside the retail survey (institutional and hospital products, bulk packages, discontinued items, and many OTC items) may never receive one. A missing price reflects the survey's scope, not this product's actual cost, and does not mean the product is free or unavailable.
Is the NDC printed on the package the same as the 11-digit billing NDC?
Yes, they identify this exact package in different formats. The form printed on the packaging and shown on DailyMed is the one the FDA registered. Insurance claims use a fixed 11-digit 5-4-2 format, so the short segment is padded with a leading zero and the dashes are dropped. The Identity section at the top of this page lists each form of this code.
Is this package still being marketed?
Yes, per the latest FDA NDC Directory data on this page: this package is listed as actively marketed, with no marketing end date reported by Jubilant HollisterStier LLC. Listing status can change — the directory data on this page refreshes weekly.
Does this product come in other package sizes?
Yes — the FDA directory lists 2 other package presentations of this same product, including 10 ml (65044-2297-02), 50 ml (65044-2297-04). Each has its own NDC and its own page — see the package list near the top of this page.
Who lists this product with the FDA?
Jubilant HollisterStier LLC is the labeler of record for this NDC — the company under whose FDA-assigned code the package is listed. The labeler may be the manufacturer itself or a distributor marketing the product under its own code.
This page identifies an FDA-listed package (the NDC) and reports public regulatory and pricing data about the listing. It is reference information, not a medical recommendation — talk to your pharmacist or prescriber about your own medication.
Where does this data come from?
Listing facts (marketing category, packager status, marketing dates) from the FDA openFDA NDC Directory; label availability from DailyMed; pricing coverage from CMS NADAC; equivalence scope from the FDA Orange Book.
For educational and professional reference only — not medical advice. Pricing reflects published NADAC and CMS ASP (free public data) and may differ from your acquisition cost; always verify before billing or dispensing.