by Eli Lilly and Company · 1 TUBE in 1 CARTON / 1 BOTTLE, UNIT-DOSE in 1 TUBE / 1 POWDER in 1 BOTTLE, UNIT-DOSE
This is a package of 1 tube of Baqsimi glucagon 3 mg Powder from Eli Lilly and Company, no longer marketed, no longer in the FDA NDC Directory; retail pharmacies pay about $269.07 per tube (NADAC). It is the main listing for this product, which comes in 2 package sizes.
NDC 00002-6145-11
🏷️ FDA NDC (as labeled)0002-6145-11billing pads the labeler segment with a zero
🗂️ FDA directory synced Oct 8, 2026 · this listing last changed Mar 13, 2024 · sources: openFDA · FDA label (DailyMed) · FDA Orange & Purple Book · First Databank · CMS NADAC, ASP, Medicare & Medicaid · RxNorm
Compiled from public FDA, CMS, DailyMed, NADAC, and related drug data sources. Editorial policy
NDC database record
One package, one record: these facts belong to NDC 0002-6145-11 alone.
Record
FDA NDC Directory package listing · Human prescription drug
Code segments
0002 labeler · 6145 product · 11 package
Billing quantity
1 EA per package
Barcode (UPC-A, from the NDC)
3 0002614511 3
Medicaid fills, this package
652 prescriptions in the last four reported quarters
FDA record last changed
Mar 13, 2024
⚠️
Other active recalls for Glucagon (different manufacturers) — 1 · tap to view
These affect other manufacturers’ products for the same ingredient — not necessarily the exact NDC on this page.
Class II · Jun 23, 2026 — CGMP deviation: OOS result observed for the Gliding Force functionality test during 12-month long term stability testing. (Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc.)· FDA recall D-0723-2026
Each entry is an official FDA enforcement report — look up any recall number in the FDA recall database ↗
⚠️
Excluded from the active FDA NDC Directory.
The labeler reported this product as discontinued, so it is excluded from the active NDC Directory. The listing was last certified through Aug 2025. A label may still appear on DailyMed, but the NDC is no longer in the current FDA NDC Directory.
Search the FDA NDC Directory ↗
Identity & classification
Regulatory identifiers FDA, NLM and CMS codes for this package
FDA NDC (as labeled)0002-6145-11
Product NDC0002-6145
11-digit billing NDC00002614511
NCPDP billing unitEA — each (per item)
Application #NDA210134
Physiologic effectAntihypoglycemic Agent [EPC], Decreased GI Motility [PE], Decreased GI Smooth Muscle Tone [PE], Decreased Glycolysis [PE], Gastrointestinal Motility Inhibitor [EPC], Increased Gluconeogenesis [PE], Increased Glycogenolysis
DEA scheduleNon-controlled
Marketing categoryNDA
Marketing statusDiscontinued
FDA listing statusDiscontinued by firm (certified through Aug 2025)
RouteNASAL
Dosage formPOWDER
SubstanceGLUCAGON
Drug-database identifiers Medi-Span GPI and First Databank GCN / HICL / AHFS classification
GCN Seq No080054
GCN46726
HICL code002795
Ingredient (HICL)Glucagon
HIC1 codeM
Therapeutic class — broad (HIC1)Blood
HIC2 codeM4
Therapeutic class — intermediate (HIC2)Affect Blood Lipids/Sugar/Amino Acids
HIC3 codeM4G
Therapeutic class — specific (HIC3)Agents To Treat Hypoglycemia (Hyperglycemics)
AHFS code68:22.12.00
AHFS classGlycogenolytic Agents
FDB label nameBAQSIMI 3 MG SPRAY ONE PACK
FDB brand nameBaqsimi
Legend statusF — Federal legend — prescription drug or device
Quick answers
GSN (GCN sequence number):080054
GCN:46726
HICL (First Databank):002795
AHFS class code:68:22.12.00
Why two NDCs?
The FDA registers this code as 0002-6145-11 — a 4-4-2 layout, and that's what's printed on the package and shown on DailyMed. For insurance claims, every NDC is standardized to a uniform 11-digit 5-4-2 format by adding a zero to the labeler segment → 00002-6145-11. Same drug, same package — only the format differs.
Where does this data come from?
Identifiers from the FDA openFDA NDC Directory and Structured Product Labeling; RxCUI from RxNorm (NLM); GPI from Medi-Span; GCN / HIC / AHFS / legend from First Databank.
Label name BAQSIMI 3 MG SPRAY ONE PACKIngredient Glucagon
📖 What it is MedlinePlus · NLM
Glucagon nasal powder is used along with emergency medical treatment to treat very low blood sugar in adults and children 4 years of age and older who have diabetes. Glucagon nasal powder is in a class of medications called glycogenolytic agents. It works by causing the liver to release stored sugar to the blood.
It treats severe low blood sugar in people with diabetes, ages 1 and up. It's meant for emergencies when the person needs someone else's help.
Put the tip in one nostril and push the plunger all the way in until the green line disappears. You don't need to sniff or inhale. Don't test it first, and call for emergency help...
Call for emergency help. Once the person wakes up and responds, give them carbohydrates by mouth. If there's no response after 15 minutes, a second dose from a new device may be gi...
Nausea, vomiting and headache are common. Nose and throat irritation and watery or red eyes are common too. Get emergency help for trouble breathing or a widespread rash.
An association is not a deficiency. Educational only — don't start or stop anything without professional guidance.
Where does this data come from?
Plain-language summary from MedlinePlus (U.S. National Library of Medicine); supplement & herbal interactions and nutrient depletion data from the Natural Medicines database; our full guide is HelloPharmacist editorial content.
A drug doesn't have one price. Each row is a different public payment system, and none is what you'd pay at the counter — that depends on your insurance. The ⓘ on each row explains what it measures.
Price system
Per ea
Per package
Retail pharmacies payNADAC · weekly
$269.074
$269.07 / 1 powder
Medicaid paysCMS SDUD · 12 mo
$293.69
$293.69 / 1 powder
Medicare drug plans payPart D · quarterly
No Part D plan price is available for this NDC in our data.
NADAC price history (per ea) — tap or hover for the price & month
Flat over the last 3 months.
Where does this data come from?
NADAC (National Average Drug Acquisition Cost) is the CMS weekly pharmacy-acquisition-cost survey — what pharmacies pay. ASP (Average Sales Price) is the CMS Medicare Part B drug-payment file, published quarterly. Medicaid pays is computed by us from CMS State Drug Utilization Data (total reimbursed ÷ units, trailing 12 months) — gross of rebates and inclusive of dispensing fees, so it reflects what Medicaid paid, not an acquisition cost. Medicare drug plans pay is the median negotiated point-of-sale unit cost across plans listing this NDC in the CMS quarterly Prescription Drug Plan pricing files, before rebates. The VA pays is the federal contract price (FSS, and the statutory Big 4 ceiling where listed) from the VA National Acquisition Center pharmaceutical price file. All are free public government data; each measures a different payer, so the figures are not directly comparable.
2 TUBE in 1 CARTON / 1 BOTTLE, UNIT-DOSE in 1 TUBE / 1 POWDER in 1 BOTTLE, UNIT-DOSE
$269.07 / ea
$538.13
2019-08-06
—
Discontinued by firm
Swipe sideways for more columns →
This pack effectively ties for the lowest per-ea cost of the 2 priced pack sizes ($269.07 NADAC).
This pack accounts for about 47% of this product's recent Medicaid fills; most go to a different pack size. See all packs ↓
Pack size FAQ
What quantity is in this package?
This package contains 1 tube — 1 tube in 1 carton / 1 bottle, unit-dose in 1 tube / 1 powder in 1 bottle, unit-dose.
How does this package differ from NDC 00002-6145-27?
Both are Baqsimi glucagon 3 mg Powder — the drug itself is identical. This page's package is the 1 tube one, while NDC 00002-6145-27 is the 2 tubes package.
What NDC number is used to bill for this package of Baqsimi glucagon 3 mg Powder?
Use the 11-digit billing form listed in the identifiers section of this page. Pharmacy and medical claims use the 11-digit form; the FDA label may print a shorter form of the same code.
Prices are the latest CMS NADAC pharmacy acquisition cost per NDC; per-pack figures are per-unit × pack quantity, shown only when the pack is denominated in the same measure NADAC prices.
About this product: this is the brand-name version. We did not find an FDA-approved generic match for this exact strength, form and route.
Where does this data come from?
Equivalents are other NDCs of the same ingredient, form and route from the openFDA NDC Directory, ranked least-expensive-first by NADAC. Therapeutic-equivalence (AB) ratings come from the FDA Orange Book; biologics use the FDA Purple Book for biosimilar & interchangeable status.
We did not find an FDA-approved generic match for this exact strength, form and route. Patent/protection dates below may affect future generic timing.
🛡️ Latest patent/protection date listed: FDA patent/protection data lists protections through Sep 2039. This may affect when a full generic version becomes widely available, but it is not a guaranteed launch date.
📅 FDA approved Jul 24, 2019RLDRS⏳ ~13 yr to latest listed protection
Why the date isn’t exact: Generic timing can change because patents may be challenged, settled, licensed, added, removed, or worked around with a narrower label — and FDA approval does not always mean a pharmacy can get the generic today.
📅When could a generic Baqsimi arrive?
Our estimate: 2036 to 2040 a wide window
How sure: Probable. More likely than not, but it can still move.
Why then: A patent that protects the brand runs out. After that, approved generics can be sold.
That is before the September 2039 date above, which is common: a court ruling or a deal with the brand’s maker often lets a generic in before the last patent runs out.
FDA-granted marketing protection. It’s separate from patents and may be shorter than patent protection.
🧪Product / substance patents
Patents covering the active ingredient, product, formulation, or related drug features.
🎯Method-of-use patents
Patents covering specific approved uses. These can sometimes be carved out with a “skinny label,” but not always.
🛈 What do these terms mean?
Patent
Legal protection listed in the Orange Book that may delay generic approval or launch. Issued by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.
Substance patent
Covers the active drug molecule itself — the hardest to design around. A generic generally can’t launch until it expires.
Formulation (product) patent
Covers a specific formulation or dosage form. A generic can sometimes work around it with a different formulation.
Method-of-use patent
A patent covering one specific approved use of the drug — not necessarily the whole molecule. A generic can sometimes launch with a “skinny label” that carves out the protected use and keeps the others.
Skinny label
A generic label that omits a still-patented use when the FDA allows it — letting a generic reach the market for the unprotected uses.
Exclusivity
FDA-granted marketing protection, separate from patents — e.g. 5-yr new chemical entity, 7-yr orphan drug, or a +6-month pediatric extension.
Paragraph IV
A generic applicant’s formal challenge to a listed patent. It can potentially lead to earlier generic entry, but often involves litigation or a settlement.
RLD / RS
Reference Listed Drug — the brand product the FDA uses as the reference for generic applications. Reference Standard — the product the FDA expects generics to compare against in bioequivalence testing.
TE / AB rating
FDA therapeutic-equivalence rating. An AB rating generally means the FDA considers a generic therapeutically equivalent to — and substitutable for — the brand.
LOE (loss of exclusivity)
The latest patent or exclusivity currently listed — the loss-of-exclusivity / latest-listed-protection date shown on this page. Paragraph-IV challenges and settlements can move the real date earlier; FDA approval and a manufacturer’s decision to market can move it later.
Built from the FDA Orange Book. The bars above are scaled to each protection’s expiry; the red LOE marker is the last one to lapse.
Is there a generic version of BAQSIMI 3 MG SPRAY ONE PACK?
No FDA-approved generic equivalent is currently listed in the FDA Orange Book for BAQSIMI 3 MG SPRAY ONE PACK. Based on the patents and exclusivity currently listed, the Orange Book estimate is that full-label generic entry may be delayed until Sep 2039 — an estimate, not a guaranteed launch date. We expect the first generic Baqsimi between 2036 and 2040. See the forecast.
The FDA approved a generic — why can’t I get it at my pharmacy yet?
FDA approval and pharmacy availability are two different things. The FDA can approve a generic years before it actually reaches pharmacies, because the brand company may still hold patents or have a settlement that delays the launch. A manufacturer also has to choose to make and sell it, and have supply ready. So a drug can be “FDA-approved generic exists” and still be brand-only at the counter today.
Why do different websites show different generic release dates?
Generic availability is not based on one single date. Some sources use the first exclusivity expiration, some use the last product patent, and others use the latest method-of-use patent. Patent challenges, settlements, licenses, and label carve-outs can also change the real-world launch date. This page shows the underlying Orange Book dates so you can see why estimates may differ.
What does “FDA listed” mean?
It means the product appears in the FDA’s official NDC directory. That’s a good sign a product exists and is intended for the U.S. market, but on its own it does not confirm a pharmacy can fill it today. Where we have recent retail pricing data (NADAC) for a product, we label it “Availability likely” instead.
What does a patent or protection date mean here?
It’s the latest date currently listed in the FDA Orange Book for a patent or exclusivity on the brand product. It can affect when a full generic version becomes widely available — but it is not a guaranteed generic launch date. Generics sometimes arrive earlier (through a settlement or patent challenge) or later (a manufacturer still has to make and sell one).
What does “current Orange Book estimate” mean?
It means we are using the latest patent and exclusivity dates currently listed in the FDA Orange Book. It is not a guaranteed launch date.
Can a generic come out before the last patent expires?
Sometimes. A generic company may challenge a patent, settle with the brand manufacturer, receive a license, or obtain approval with a narrower label that avoids a patented use. In other cases, the last listed protection may delay full-label generic competition.
Can a generic come out after the listed dates?
Yes. Even after patents or exclusivity expire, a generic still needs FDA approval and a manufacturer must choose to market it. Supply, litigation, business decisions, or regulatory issues can delay actual availability.
What is the difference between patents and exclusivity?
Patents are legal protections usually issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. FDA exclusivity is marketing protection granted by the FDA. They are separate, and either one can affect generic timing.
Why are there multiple patent dates?
One drug can have several patents covering different things: the active ingredient, a formulation, a manufacturing process, or a specific approved use. That is why a page may show several expiration dates instead of one simple generic date.
Built from FDA Orange Book patent and exclusivity data. Dates are refreshed from public FDA data when available; the marker is max(latest patent expiry, latest exclusivity expiry). Paragraph-IV settlements and first-filer 180-day exclusivity can shift the real date; a method-of-use patent may allow an earlier skinny-label generic for non-protected indications. Generic launch timing is an estimate, not a guarantee.
Where does this data come from?
Patents and exclusivity from the FDA Orange Book (small-molecule drugs), refreshed from public FDA data. Generic launch timing is an estimate, not a guarantee.
Inactive ingredients, also called excipients, are components of the drug product
other than the active ingredient. They may include fillers, dyes, coatings, preservatives, flavors,
or other formulation ingredients.
Loading inactive ingredients from the official FDA label in the background. No external source is being called by this page request.
Where does this data come from?
Source: official FDA Structured Product Labeling (SPL) via DailyMed and the openFDA label index. Structured IACT rows and label-wide narrative are kept separate; availability and product-level specificity depend on the submitted label.
Are inactive ingredients the same for every manufacturer?
No. Inactive ingredients can differ by manufacturer, dosage form, strength, and package / product version.
Why might an inactive ingredient be missing?
Some SPLs do not provide a complete structured inactive-ingredient list, and older or unusual labels may only include the information in narrative text.
Can inactive ingredients matter?
Yes. They can matter for allergies, intolerances, dyes, gluten / lactose concerns, preservatives, and formulation differences — but confirm with a pharmacist or the manufacturer when it’s clinically important.
Manufacturer & labeler
LabelerEli Lilly and Company
Application holderAMPHASTAR PHARMACEUTICALS INC
FDA applicationNDA210134 (NDA)
Labeler code00002
Product typeHuman Prescription Drug
Portfolio194 products on file
More NDCs from Eli Lilly and Company labeler code 00002
The labeler markets the product; the application holder owns the FDA approval. They’re often the same company but can differ (e.g. a repackager or an authorized generic). A mailing address / phone appears here when the manufacturer includes it in the product’s FDA label (not all do).
Where does this data come from?
Labeler, application holder and registered establishment from the FDA openFDA NDC Directory and Drugs@FDA; address/contact from the product’s FDA label.
The complete FDA label for this product — the official prescribing information, verbatim, section by section. Jump with a chip, search within the label, or expand everything.
No FDA label is on file for this product yet. Labels load from openFDA / DailyMed and refresh weekly.
No label section mentions that — try another word, or open the full label on DailyMed below.
Source: FDA Structured Product Labeling, mirrored from DailyMed / openFDA.
Medicaid utilization & spend
📍 This exact package only: Medicaid data is reported per full 11-digit NDC — labeler, product and pack size — so every number here is for this package alone, not the drug overall. Other pack sizes report separately.
💊 Pharmacy benefit only: These are Medicaid outpatient pharmacy claims, billed by NDC. They exclude the medical benefit — clinic- or hospital-administered drugs billed under HCPCS J-codes — so drugs used mostly that way (e.g. Avastin, Lucentis, Keytruda) can look low or missing here. That’s expected, not an error.
📅 Q1 2025 – Q4 2025 · 4 quarters of data
ⓘ The newest quarter is usually incomplete when first published; states restate recent quarters in later CMS releases, so the latest figures typically revise upward. State coverage-policy changes can also shift quarter-to-quarter totals.
Prescriptions last 4 qtrs
652
Units reimbursed last 4 qtrs
905
Gross reimbursed last 4 qtrs
$265.8K
Avg / prescription
$407.65
Avg / unit
$293.69
Latest quarter Q4 2025
0Rx
Medicaid pays / ea
$293.69
gross reimbursed
vs
NADAC / ea
$269.07
acquisition cost
=
Spread
+$24.6158
+9% vs cost
What Medicaid paid per ea (before rebates; includes the pharmacy’s dispensing fee) compared with NADAC — the average price pharmacies pay to buy the drug. A positive spread means Medicaid reimbursed more than the purchase price, before manufacturer rebates.
Fee-for-service vs managed care ⓘ
34% FFS66% MCO
Fee-for-service · 221 Rx Managed care · 431 Rx
State Medicaid map
Units reimbursed · per 100k residents
0.11.1
gray = no data reported ⓘ
Colors are per 100,000 residents, so big states don’t automatically dominate. Tap or hover a state for its actual totals.
Tap or hover a state
…for its Medicaid breakdown
Prescriptions—
Units—
Reimbursed—
🏆 Top states by units · per 100k residents
1New York1.1 /100k
2New Jersey0.9 /100k
3Pennsylvania0.8 /100k
4Maryland0.6 /100k
5Michigan0.6 /100k
6Ohio0.5 /100k
7Louisiana0.5 /100k
8Minnesota0.5 /100k
National units — by quarter
💵 About the dollar figures: “reimbursed” is what Medicaid paid pharmacies before confidential manufacturer rebates, so the program’s real net cost is lower than these numbers. Fee-for-service and managed-care claims are combined unless split above. Source: CMS State Drug Utilization Data; per-100k rates use 2023 Census population estimates.
Medicaid utilization by pack size
Medicaid (SDUD) totals over the four most recent reported quarters for every package size of this drug — handy when a specific package (e.g. a starter/titration pack) carries little or no Medicaid volume on its own.
Drug total (last 4 qtrs): 1,379 Rx · 2,271 units · $651,988 gross reimbursed
Tap a pack size to open its page. Source: CMS State Drug Utilization Data, last 4 quarters.
Medicare Part D spend CMS · PART D · 2026 (Q1)
Medicare Part D (outpatient prescription) spending for Baqsimi — the program that covers self-administered drugs. 1 manufacturer.
⚠️ Drug-level data: CMS publishes Part D spending by drug, not by NDC — these figures combine every manufacturer, strength and package size sold under the name Baqsimi. That’s a different level of aggregation than the Medicaid card above, which is specific to this exact 11-digit NDC (pack size included), so the two aren’t directly comparable.
Period
Total Part D spend
$8.9M
Claims incl. refills
17.1K
Beneficiaries
14.6K
Spend / beneficiary
$610.50
Spend / claim
$520.88
Trend by period
💵 About the dollar figures: spending is what Part D plans paid before confidential manufacturer rebates, so the program’s real net cost is lower. A blank patient count means fewer than 11 people — CMS hides counts that small to protect privacy. Source: CMS Medicare Quarterly Part D Spending by Drug (data.cms.gov), updated quarterly.
About this NDC listing & data coverage
Finished prescription productNo longer marketed (per FDA listing data)
What data is (and isn’t) available for this NDC — tap to expand
NDC identity (package / product / labeler codes)
✓ Available
Labeler
✓ Available
Product & package description
✓ Available
Marketing category & status
✓ Available
Active ingredient / dosage form / route
✓ Available
FDA label (SPL via DailyMed)
— Not published for this NDCNo structured label is linked to this listing in DailyMed/openFDA.
Package photos
— Not published for this NDCNo photo available yet for this listing.
Inactive ingredients (structured)
— Not published for this NDCThe labeler did not submit a structured excipient list, or no SPL is available.
NADAC pharmacy acquisition price (CMS)
✓ Available
Orange Book / therapeutic-equivalence data
✓ Available
HCPCS J-code billing crosswalk
— Not published for this NDCMost self-administered / retail products have no J-code — that is normal.
Medicaid utilization (CMS SDUD)
✓ Available
“Not published” reflects what the public FDA / CMS / NLM sources provide for this exact package code — it is a property of the data feeds, not a judgment about the product.
Questions about this listing
Why is there no full label on this page?
No structured FDA label (SPL) is currently linked to this NDC in DailyMed/openFDA. That can happen with older listings, certain OTC and repackaged products, and recently updated listings whose label has not yet propagated. The listing itself is still valid — this page shows everything the public feeds provide for this package.
What does the discontinued status mean for this NDC?
The labeler reported a marketing end date (or the listing was delisted), so this specific package is no longer actively marketed. Remaining stock may still be dispensed for a time, and the NDC stays valid for historical records and claims — but data feeds (pricing, labeling) typically stop updating for it. Other package sizes or other manufacturers' versions of the same medication may still be marketed — see the equivalents section where available.
Is the NDC printed on the package the same as the 11-digit billing NDC?
Yes, they identify this exact package in different formats. The form printed on the packaging and shown on DailyMed is the one the FDA registered. Insurance claims use a fixed 11-digit 5-4-2 format, so the short segment is padded with a leading zero and the dashes are dropped. The Identity section at the top of this page lists each form of this code.
Does this product come in other package sizes?
Yes — the FDA directory lists 1 other package presentation of this same product, including 2 tubes (00002-6145-27). Each has its own NDC and its own page — see the package list near the top of this page.
Who lists this product with the FDA?
Eli Lilly and Company is the labeler of record for this NDC — the company under whose FDA-assigned code the package is listed. The labeler may be the manufacturer itself or a distributor marketing the product under its own code.
Do I need a prescription for this product?
This NDC is listed with FDA as a prescription product, so it is dispensed under a prescriber's order. Your pharmacist can tell you whether any over-the-counter forms of the same medication exist.
This page identifies an FDA-listed package (the NDC) and reports public regulatory and pricing data about the listing. It is reference information, not a medical recommendation — talk to your pharmacist or prescriber about your own medication.
Where does this data come from?
Listing facts (marketing category, packager status, marketing dates) from the FDA openFDA NDC Directory; label availability from DailyMed; pricing coverage from CMS NADAC; equivalence scope from the FDA Orange Book.
For educational and professional reference only — not medical advice. Pricing reflects published
NADAC and CMS ASP (free public data) and may differ from your acquisition cost; always verify before billing or dispensing.