Perampanel 8 mg Tablet, Film Coated, 30-count — NDC 72205-224-30 (Billing 72205-0224-30)

12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

12.1Mechanism of Action Perampanel is a non-competitive antagonist of the ionotropic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptor on post-synaptic neurons. Glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and is implicated in a number of neurological disorders caused by neuronal over excitation. The precise mechanism by which perampanel exerts its antiepileptic effects in humans is unknown.

12.2Pharmacodynamics Psychomotor Performance In a healthy volunteer study to assess the effects of perampanel tablets on psychomotor performance using a standard battery of assessments including simulated driving, single and multiple daily doses of perampanel 4 mg did not impair simple psychomotor tasks, driving performance, or sensorimotor coordination. Single and multiple doses of 8 mg and 12 mg impaired psychomotor performance in a dose-related manner. Car handling ability was impaired after dosing of perampanel 12 mg, but postural stability was not significantly impaired.

Performance testing returned to baseline within 2 weeks of cessation of perampanel dosing. Interactions with Alcohol In the above study (see Psychomotor Performance), when administered to healthy subjects receiving alcohol to achieve a blood concentration of 80 to 100 mg/100 mL, perampanel consistently impaired simple psychomotor performance after single doses of 4 to 12 mg, and after 21 days of multiple 12 mg/day doses. The effects of perampanel on complex tasks such as driving ability were additive or supra-additive to the impairment effects of alcohol.

Perampanel enhanced the effects of alcohol on vigilance and alertness, and increased levels of anger, confusion, and depression. Potential to Prolong QT Interval In a placebo-controlled thorough QT study of perampanel in healthy subjects, there was no evidence that perampanel caused QT interval prolongation of clinical significance at doses of 6 or 12 mg (i.e., the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the largest placebo-adjusted baseline-corrected QTc was below 10 msec). The exposures observed with the 12 mg dose in this study will not cover the exposures expected in patients with hepatic impairment taking doses over 6 mg/day.

At the highest recommended dose (12 mg), perampanel did not prolong the QTc interval to any clinically relevant extent.

12.3Pharmacokinetics Pharmacokinetics of perampanel are similar in healthy subjects, patients with partial-onset seizures, and patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The half-life of perampanel is about 105 hours, so that steady state is reached in about 2 to 3 weeks. AUC of perampanel increased in a dose-proportional manner after single-dose administration of 0.2 to 12 mg tablets and after multiple-dose administration of 1 to 12 mg tablets once daily.

FYCOMPA oral suspension has comparable bioavailability to perampanel tablets under steady state. Both formulations may be used interchangeably. The pharmacokinetics of perampanel are similar when used as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures (in the absence of concomitant moderate or strong CYP3A4 inducers).

Absorption Perampanel is rapidly and completely absorbed after oral administration with negligible first-pass metabolism. Median time to reach peak concentration (t max ) ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 hours under fasted condition. Co-administration of perampanel tablet with a high fat meal had no impact on the total exposure (AUC 0-inf ) of perampanel and reduced the peak plasma concentration (C max ) of perampanel by 11% to 40%.

The t max was delayed by approximately 1 to 3 hours in fed state compared to that under fasted conditions. Distribution Data from in vitro studies indicate that, in the concentration range of 20 to 2000 ng/mL, perampanel is approximately 95 to 96% bound to plasma proteins, mainly bound to albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein. Blood to plasma rati… [Excerpted — this section continues on DailyMed.]

12.1Mechanism of Action Perampanel is a non-competitive antagonist of the ionotropic α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) glutamate receptor on post-synaptic neurons. Glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system and is implicated in a number of neurological disorders caused by neuronal over excitation. The precise mechanism by which perampanel exerts its antiepileptic effects in humans is unknown.

12.3Pharmacokinetics Pharmacokinetics of perampanel are similar in healthy subjects, patients with partial-onset seizures, and patients with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. The half-life of perampanel is about 105 hours, so that steady state is reached in about 2 to 3 weeks. AUC of perampanel increased in a dose-proportional manner after single-dose administration of 0.2 to 12 mg tablets and after multiple-dose administration of 1 to 12 mg tablets once daily.

FYCOMPA oral suspension has comparable bioavailability to perampanel tablets under steady state. Both formulations may be used interchangeably. The pharmacokinetics of perampanel are similar when used as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures (in the absence of concomitant moderate or strong CYP3A4 inducers).

Absorption Perampanel is rapidly and completely absorbed after oral administration with negligible first-pass metabolism. Median time to reach peak concentration (t max ) ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 hours under fasted condition. Co-administration of perampanel tablet with a high fat meal had no impact on the total exposure (AUC 0-inf ) of perampanel and reduced the peak plasma concentration (C max ) of perampanel by 11% to 40%.

The t max was delayed by approximately 1 to 3 hours in fed state compared to that under fasted conditions. Distribution Data from in vitro studies indicate that, in the concentration range of 20 to 2000 ng/mL, perampanel is approximately 95 to 96% bound to plasma proteins, mainly bound to albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein. Blood to plasma ratio of perampanel is 0.55 to 0.59.

Metabolism Perampanel is extensively metabolized via primary oxidation and sequential glucuronidation. Oxidative metabolism is primarily mediated by CYP3A4/5 and to a lesser extent by CYP1A2 and CYP2B6, based on results of in vitro studies using recombinant human CYPs and human liver microsomes. Other CYP enzymes may also be involved.

Following administration of radiolabeled perampanel, unchanged perampanel accounted for 74 to 80% of total radioactivity in systemic circulation, whereas only trace amounts of individual perampanel metabolites were detected in plasma. Elimination Following administration of a radiolabeled perampanel tablet dose to 8 healthy elderly subjects, 22% of administered radioactivity was recovered in the urine and 48% in the feces. In urine and feces, recovered radioactivity was primarily composed of a mixture of oxidative and conjugated metabolites.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of pooled data from 19 Phase 1 studies reported that t 1/2 of perampanel was 105 hours on average. Apparent clearance of perampanel in healthy subjects and patients was approximately 12 mL/min. Specific Populations Hepatic Impairment The pharmacokinetics of perampanel following a single 1 mg tablet dose were evaluated in 12 subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A and B, respectively) compared with 12 demographically matched healthy subjects.

The total (free and protein bound) exposure (AUC 0-inf ) of perampanel was 50% greater in subjects with mild hepatic impairment and more than doubled (2.55-fold) in subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared to their healthy controls. The AUC 0-inf of free perampanel in subjects with mild and moderate hepatic impairment was 1.8-fold and 3.3-fold, respectively, of those in matched healthy controls. The t 1/2 was prolonged in subjects with mild impairment (306 vs.

125 hours) and moderate impairment (295 vs. 139 hours). Perampanel has not been studied in subjects with severe hepatic impairment [ see Dosage and Administration (2.4) , Use in Specific Populations (8.6) ].

Renal Impairment A dedicated study has not been conducted to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of perampanel in patients with renal impairment. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on pooled data from patients with partial-onset seizures and receiving perampanel tablets up to 12 mg/… [Excerpted — this section continues on DailyMed.]

12.2Pharmacodynamics Psychomotor Performance In a healthy volunteer study to assess the effects of perampanel tablets on psychomotor performance using a standard battery of assessments including simulated driving, single and multiple daily doses of perampanel 4 mg did not impair simple psychomotor tasks, driving performance, or sensorimotor coordination. Single and multiple doses of 8 mg and 12 mg impaired psychomotor performance in a dose-related manner. Car handling ability was impaired after dosing of perampanel 12 mg, but postural stability was not significantly impaired.

Performance testing returned to baseline within 2 weeks of cessation of perampanel dosing. Interactions with Alcohol In the above study (see Psychomotor Performance), when administered to healthy subjects receiving alcohol to achieve a blood concentration of 80 to 100 mg/100 mL, perampanel consistently impaired simple psychomotor performance after single doses of 4 to 12 mg, and after 21 days of multiple 12 mg/day doses. The effects of perampanel on complex tasks such as driving ability were additive or supra-additive to the impairment effects of alcohol.

Perampanel enhanced the effects of alcohol on vigilance and alertness, and increased levels of anger, confusion, and depression. Potential to Prolong QT Interval In a placebo-controlled thorough QT study of perampanel in healthy subjects, there was no evidence that perampanel caused QT interval prolongation of clinical significance at doses of 6 or 12 mg (i.e., the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for the largest placebo-adjusted baseline-corrected QTc was below 10 msec). The exposures observed with the 12 mg dose in this study will not cover the exposures expected in patients with hepatic impairment taking doses over 6 mg/day.

At the highest recommended dose (12 mg), perampanel did not prolong the QTc interval to any clinically relevant extent.

14 CLINICAL STUDIES

14.1Partial-Onset Seizures The efficacy of perampanel in partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization, was studied in patients who were not adequately controlled with 1 to 3 concomitant AEDs in 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials (Studies 1, 2, and 3) in adult and pediatric patients (12 years of age and older). All trials had an initial 6-week Baseline Period, during which patients were required to have more than five seizures in order to be randomized. The Baseline Period was followed by a 19-week Treatment Period consisting of a 6-week Titration Phase and a 13-week Maintenance Phase.

Patients in these 3 trials had a mean duration of epilepsy of approximately 21 years and a median baseline seizure frequency ranging from 9 to 14 seizures per 28 days. During the trials, more than 85% of patients were taking 2 to 3 concomitant AEDs with or without concurrent vagal nerve stimulation, and approximately 50% were on at least one AED known to induce CYP3A4, an enzyme critical to the metabolism of perampanel (i.e., carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, or phenytoin), resulting in a significant reduction in perampanel’s serum concentration [ see Drug Interactions (7.2), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ].

Each study evaluated placebo and multiple perampanel dosages (see Figure 1). During the Titration period in all 3 trials, patients on perampanel received an initial 2 mg once daily dose, which was subsequently increased in weekly increments of 2 mg per day to the final dose. Patients experiencing intolerable adverse reactions were permitted to have their dose reduced to the previously tolerated dose.

The primary endpoint in Studies 1, 2, and 3 was the percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days during the Treatment Period as compared to the Baseline Period. The criterion for statistical significance was p<0.05. A statistically significant decrease in seizure rate was observed at doses of 4 to 12 mg per day.

Dose response was apparent at 4 to 8 mg with little additional reduction in frequency at 12 mg per day. Figure 1. Median Percent Reduction in Seizure Frequency per 28 Days from Baseline to Treatment Period Tables 4 and 5 present an analysis combining data from all 3 studies, grouping patients based upon whether or not concomitant enzyme-inducing AEDs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, or phenytoin) were used.

The analysis revealed a substantially reduced effect in the presence of inducers. Table 4. Median Percent Reduction for Combined Studies (Study 1, 2 and 3) Based on the Presence or Absence of Concomitant Enzyme-Inducing AEDs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin) a Without Enzyme-Inducing AEDs With Enzyme-Inducing AEDs Placebo % Perampanel % Placebo % Perampanel % 2 mg/day 16 23 14 16 4 mg/day 16 22 14 33 8 mg/day 19 45 12 24 12 mg/day 19 54 9 22 a Patients from Latin American region are excluded because of a significant treatment-by-region interaction due to high placebo response Table 5.

Responder Rate for Combined Studies (Study 1, 2 and 3) Based on the Presence or Absence of Concomitant Enzyme-Inducing AEDs (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin) a,b Without Enzyme-Inducing AEDs With Enzyme-Inducing AEDs Placebo % Perampanel % Placebo % Perampanel % 2 mg/day 19 26 18 20 4 mg/day 19 35 18 26 8 mg/day 17 45 19 32 12 mg/day 15 54 21 33 a Patients from Latin American region are excluded because of a significant treatment-by-region interaction due to high placebo response b The proportion of patients with at least a 50% decrease in seizure frequency Figure 2 shows the proportion of patients with different percent reductions during the maintenance phase over baseline across all three trials.

Patients in whom the seizure frequency increased are shown at left as “worse.” Patients in whom the seizure frequency decreased are shown in the remaining four categories. Figure 2. Proportion of Patients Exhibiting Different Percent Reductions During the Maintenance Phase Over… [Excerpted — this section continues on DailyMed.]

13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY

13.1Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility Carcinogenesis Perampanel was administered orally to mice (1, 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg/day) and rats (10, 30, or 100 mg/kg/day in males; 3, 10, or 30 mg/kg/day in females) for up to 104 weeks. There was no evidence of drug-related tumors in either species. Plasma perampanel exposures (AUC) at the highest doses tested were less than that in humans dosed at 8 mg/day.

Mutagenesis Perampanel was negative in the in vitro Ames and mouse lymphoma tk assays, and in the in vivo rat micronucleus assay. Impairment of Fertility In male and female rats administered perampanel (oral doses of 1, 10, or 30 mg/kg/day) prior to and throughout mating and continuing in females to gestation day 6, there were no clear effects on fertility. Prolonged and/or irregular estrus cycles were observed at all doses but particularly at the highest dose tested.

Plasma perampanel exposures (AUC) at all doses were lower than that in humans dosed at 8 mg/day.